Literature DB >> 21696329

The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Yang-Soo Yoon1, Yongxin Li, Hou-Yong Kang, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The full benefit of bilateral cochlear implants may depend on the unilateral performance with each device, the speech materials, processing ability of the user, and/or the listening environment. In this study, bilateral and unilateral speech performances were evaluated in terms of recognition of phonemes and sentences presented in quiet or in noise.
DESIGN: Speech recognition was measured for unilateral left, unilateral right, and bilateral listening conditions; speech and noise were presented at 0° azimuth. The 'binaural benefit' was defined as the difference between bilateral performance and unilateral performance with the better ear. STUDY SAMPLE: Nine adults with bilateral cochlear implants participated.
RESULTS: On average, results showed a greater binaural benefit in noise than in quiet for all speech tests. More importantly, the binaural benefit was greater when unilateral performance was similar across ears. As the difference in unilateral performance between ears increased, the binaural advantage decreased; this functional relationship was observed across the different speech materials and noise levels even though there was substantial intra- and inter-subject variability.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that subjects who show symmetry in speech recognition performance between implanted ears in general show a large binaural benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21696329      PMCID: PMC3160169          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.580785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Richard Ramsden; Paula Greenham; Martin O'Driscoll; Deborah Mawman; David Proops; Louise Craddock; Claire Fielden; John Graham; Leah Meerton; Carl Verschuur; Joseph Toner; Cecilia McAnallen; Jonathan Osborne; Maire Doran; Roger Gray; Margaret Pickerill
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.

Authors:  Todd A Ricketts; D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Some implications of audiological measures in the population for binaural aiding strategies.

Authors:  A C Davis; M P Haggard
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1982

5.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Adult auditory learning and training.

Authors:  K Robinson; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Benefit from binaural hearing aids in individuals with a severe hearing impairment.

Authors:  G A Day; G G Browning; S Gatehouse
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1988-11

9.  An influence of binaural hearing aids on positioning of sound images.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T Letowski; D Mason
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1980-09

10.  Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Authors:  Roland Laszig; Antje Aschendorff; Matthias Stecker; Joachim Müller-Deile; Steffen Maune; Norbert Dillier; Benno Weber; Matthias Hey; Klaus Begall; Thomas Lenarz; Rolf-D Battmer; Melanie Böhm; Thomas Steffens; Juergen Strutz; Thomas Linder; Rudolf Probst; John Allum; Martin Westhofen; Wolfgang Doering
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cochlear implants: the hazards of unexpected success.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Binaural benefit for speech recognition with spectral mismatch across ears in simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Aiguo Liu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; David M Landsberger; Peter Schleich; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Bimodal benefit depends on the performance difference between a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Jae-Sook Gho; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-10-20

6.  Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Binaural benefit with and without a bilateral spectral mismatch in acoustic simulations of cochlear implant processing.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  [Inpatient rehabilitation of adult CI users: Results in dependency of duration of deafness, CI experience and age].

Authors:  R Zeh; U Baumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Huajun Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.