Literature DB >> 22968427

Binaural benefit with and without a bilateral spectral mismatch in acoustic simulations of cochlear implant processing.

Yang-Soo Yoon1, You-Ree Shin, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether a spectral mismatch across ears influences the benefit of redundancy, squelch, and head shadow differently in speech perception using acoustic simulation of bilateral cochlear implant (CI) processing.
DESIGN: Ten normal-hearing subjects participated in the study, and acoustic simulations of CIs were used to test these subjects. Sentence recognition, presented unilaterally and bilaterally, was measured at +5 dB and +10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) with bilaterally matched and mismatched conditions. Unilateral and bilateral CIs were simulated using 8-channel sine wave vocoders. Binaural spectral mismatch was introduced by changing the relative simulated insertion depths across ears. Subjects were tested while listening with headphones; head-related transfer functions were applied before the vocoder processing to preserve natural interaural level and time differences.
RESULTS: For both SNRs, greater and more consistent binaural benefit of squelch and redundancy occurred for the matched condition whereas binaural interference of squelch and redundancy occurred for the mismatched condition. However, significant binaural benefit of head shadow existed irrespective of spectral mismatches and SNRs.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that bilateral spectral mismatch may have a negative impact on the binaural benefit of squelch and redundancy for bilateral CI users. The results also suggest that clinical mapping should be carefully administrated for bilateral CI users to minimize the difference in spectral patterns between the two CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22968427      PMCID: PMC3525748          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826709e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  32 in total

1.  Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies.

Authors:  Deidra A Blanks; Jason M Roberts; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-07-27

2.  Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Shelley A Witt; William G Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Benoit Godey; Alain Robier; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse; Philippe Bordure; Michel Mondain; Didier Bouccara; Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Stéphanie Borel; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Evelyne Ferrary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Hearing-in-noise benefits after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation continue to improve 4 years after implantation.

Authors:  Rose J Eapen; Emily Buss; Marcia Clark Adunka; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Daniel M Zeitler; Megan A Kessler; Vitaly Terushkin; Thomas J Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Anil K Lalwani; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Corey Shayman; Akila Prasad; Deepa Suneel; Julia Stelmach
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Searching for the Sound of a Cochlear Implant: Evaluation of Different Vocoder Parameters by Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Chadlia Karoui; Chris James; Pascal Barone; David Bakhos; Mathieu Marx; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Saffron Morris; Pádraig Thomas Kitterick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.