Literature DB >> 21735330

Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.

Alexandra Jesse1, James M McQueen.   

Abstract

Listeners use lexical knowledge to adjust to speakers' idiosyncratic pronunciations. Dutch listeners learn to interpret an ambiguous sound between /s/ and /f/ as /f/ if they hear it word-finally in Dutch words normally ending in /f/, but as /s/ if they hear it in normally /s/-final words. Here, we examined two positional effects in lexically guided retuning. In Experiment 1, ambiguous sounds during exposure always appeared in word-initial position (replacing the first sounds of /f/- or /s/-initial words). No retuning was found. In Experiment 2, the same ambiguous sounds always appeared word-finally during exposure. Here, retuning was found. Lexically guided perceptual learning thus appears to emerge reliably only when lexical knowledge is available as the to-be-tuned segment is initially being processed. Under these conditions, however, lexically guided retuning was position independent: It generalized across syllabic positions. Lexical retuning can thus benefit future recognition of particular sounds wherever they appear in words.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735330     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0129-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect.

Authors:  Paul Bertelson; Jean Vroomen; Béatrice De Gelder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

3.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller; David DeSteno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

7.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality.

Authors:  Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon.

Authors:  James M McQueen; Anne Cutler; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-12

10.  The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; David R Wozny; Holger Mitterer; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-07-01

3.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Perceptual learning of speech under optimal and adverse conditions.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perceptual learning of degraded speech by minimizing prediction error.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Use what you can: storage, abstraction processes, and perceptual adjustments help listeners recognize reduced forms.

Authors:  Katja Poellmann; Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-30

9.  Constraints on the transfer of perceptual learning in accented speech.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Alissa Melinger; Andrea Weber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-01

10.  Phonetic recalibration of speech by text.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Lemmy Schakel; Milene Bonte; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.