Literature DB >> 18377182

Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality.

Alexis Hervais-Adelman1, Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

Speech comprehension is resistant to acoustic distortion in the input, reflecting listeners' ability to adjust perceptual processes to match the speech input. This adjustment is reflected in improved comprehension of distorted speech with experience. For noise vocoding, a manipulation that removes spectral detail from speech, listeners' word report showed a significantly greater improvement over trials for listeners that heard clear speech presentations before rather than after hearing distorted speech (clear-then-distorted compared with distorted-then-clear feedback, in Experiment 1). This perceptual learning generalized to untrained words suggesting a sublexical locus for learning and was equivalent for word and nonword training stimuli (Experiment 2). These findings point to the crucial involvement of phonological short-term memory and top-down processes in the perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech. Similar processes may facilitate comprehension of speech in an unfamiliar accent or following cochlear implantation. (Copyright) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377182     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  55 in total

1.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Jeremy L Loebach; Lawrence Phillips; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

7.  Linguistically guided adaptation to foreign-accented speech.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-04-21

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.