Literature DB >> 17484419

An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception.

Daniel Mirman1, James L McClelland, Lori L Holt.   

Abstract

We describe an account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception based on interactive processing and Hebbian learning. Interactive feedback provides lexical information to prelexical levels, and Hebbian learning uses that information to retune the mapping from auditory input to prelexical representations of speech. Simulations of an extension of the TRACE model of speech perception are presented that demonstrate the efficacy of this mechanism. Further simulations show that acoustic similarity can account for the patterns of speaker generalization. This account addresses the role of lexical information in guiding both perception and learning with a single set of principles of information propagation.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484419      PMCID: PMC2291357          DOI: 10.3758/bf03213909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited.

Authors:  G Bi ; M Poo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception.

Authors:  Bruce D McCandliss; Julie A Fiez; Athanassios Protopapas; Mary Conway; James L McClelland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

5.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-07-30       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M N Gjaja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James L McClelland; Daniel Mirman; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

3.  Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 5.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Rebecca A Gilbert; Matthew H Davis; M Gareth Gaskell; Lauren Farrar; Sarah Adler; Jennifer M Rodd
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

8.  Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.