Literature DB >> 30180678

Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Julia R Drouin1, Rachel M Theodore1.   

Abstract

Listeners use lexical information to resolve ambiguity in the speech signal, resulting in the restructuring of speech sound categories. Recent findings suggest that lexically guided perceptual learning is attenuated when listeners use a perception-focused listening strategy (that directs attention towards surface variation) compared to when listeners use a comprehension-focused listening strategy (that directs attention towards higher-level linguistic information). However, previous investigations used the word position of the ambiguity to manipulate listening strategy, raising the possibility that attenuated learning reflected decreased strength of lexical recruitment instead of a perception-oriented listening strategy. The current work tests this hypothesis. Listeners completed an exposure phase followed by a test phase. During exposure, listeners heard an ambiguous fricative embedded in word-medial lexical contexts that supported realization of the ambiguity as /∫/. At test, listeners categorized members of an /ɑsi/-/ɑ∫i/ continuum. Listening strategy was manipulated via exposure task (experiment 1) and explicit acknowledgement of the ambiguity (experiment 2). Compared to control participants, listeners who were exposed to the ambiguity showed more /∫/ responses at the test; critically, the magnitude of learning did not differ across listening strategy conditions. These results suggest that given sufficient lexical context, lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30180678      PMCID: PMC6117182          DOI: 10.1121/1.5047672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Andrea Weber; Holger Mitterer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers; Janice A Lomibao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The bounds on flexibility in speech perception.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts.

Authors:  L Polka; J F Werker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.

Authors:  R A Fox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The dynamic nature of speech perception.

Authors:  James M McQueen; Dennis Norris; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lexical Information Guides Retuning of Neural Patterns in Perceptual Learning for Speech.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; João M Correia; Dave F Kleinschmidt; Laura Mesite; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.

Authors:  Shawn N Cummings; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Talker-specific pronunciation or speech error? Discounting (or not) atypical pronunciations during speech perception.

Authors:  Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Nikole Giovannone; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; Hannah Mechtenberg; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.