Literature DB >> 12558290

Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

J Sean Allen1, Joanne L Miller, David DeSteno.   

Abstract

Individual talkers differ in the acoustic properties of their speech, and at least some of these differences are in acoustic properties relevant for phonetic perception. Recent findings from studies of speech perception have shown that listeners can exploit such differences to facilitate both the recognition of talkers' voices and the recognition of words spoken by familiar talkers. These findings motivate the current study, whose aim is to examine individual talker variation in a particular phonetically-relevant acoustic property, voice-onset-time (VOT). VOT is a temporal property that robustly specifies voicing in stop consonants. From the broad literature involving VOT, it appears that individual talkers differ from one another in their VOT productions. The current study confirmed this finding for eight talkers producing monosyllabic words beginning with voiceless stop consonants. Moreover, when differences in VOT due to variability in speaking rate across the talkers were factored out using hierarchical linear modeling, individual talkers still differed from one another in VOT, though these differences were attenuated. These findings provide evidence that VOT varies systematically from talker to talker and may therefore be one phonetically-relevant acoustic property underlying listeners' capacity to benefit from talker-specific experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558290     DOI: 10.1121/1.1528172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Maura Moyle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Voicing and devoicing assimilation of French /s/ and /z/.

Authors:  Nassima B Abdelli-Beruh
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

3.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Thomas P Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

7.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller; David DeSteno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sociolinguistic Perception as Inference Under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; Kodi Weatherholtz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

10.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.