Literature DB >> 12948518

Perceptual learning in speech.

Dennis Norris1, James M McQueen, Anne Cutler.   

Abstract

This study demonstrates that listeners use lexical knowledge in perceptual learning of speech sounds. Dutch listeners first made lexical decisions on Dutch words and nonwords. The final fricative of 20 critical words had been replaced by an ambiguous sound, between [f] and [s]. One group of listeners heard ambiguous [f]-final words (e.g., [WItlo?], from witlof, chicory) and unambiguous [s]-final words (e.g., naaldbos, pine forest). Another group heard the reverse (e.g., ambiguous [na:ldbo?], unambiguous witlof). Listeners who had heard [?] in [f]-final words were subsequently more likely to categorize ambiguous sounds on an [f]-[s] continuum as [f] than those who heard [?] in [s]-final words. Control conditions ruled out alternative explanations based on selective adaptation and contrast. Lexical information can thus be used to train categorization of speech. This use of lexical information differs from the on-line lexical feedback embodied in interactive models of speech perception. In contrast to on-line feedback, lexical feedback for learning is of benefit to spoken word recognition (e.g., in adapting to a newly encountered dialect).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948518     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00006-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  168 in total

1.  Perceptual learning evidence for contextually-specific representations.

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-21

2.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

4.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Contextual Influences on Phonetic Categorization in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Jean A Campbell; Heather L McSherry; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-19

7.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Sonia A Krol; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.