Literature DB >> 11301575

Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

D Norris1, J M McQueen, A Cutler.   

Abstract

Top-down feedback does not benefit speech recognition; on the contrary, it can hinder it. No experimental data imply that feedback loops are required for speech recognition. Feedback is accordingly unnecessary and spoken word recognition is modular. To defend this thesis, we analyse lexical involvement in phonemic decision making. TRACE (McClelland & Elman 1986), a model with feedback from the lexicon to prelexical processes, is unable to account for all the available data on phonemic decision making. The modular Race model (Cutler & Norris 1979) is likewise challenged by some recent results, however. We therefore present a new modular model of phonemic decision making, the Merge model. In Merge, information flows from prelexical processes to the lexicon without feedback. Because phonemic decisions are based on the merging of prelexical and lexical information, Merge correctly predicts lexical involvement in phonemic decisions in both words and nonwords. Computer simulations show how Merge is able to account for the data through a process of competition between lexical hypotheses. We discuss the issue of feedback in other areas of language processing and conclude that modular models are particularly well suited to the problems and constraints of speech recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11301575     DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00003241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  137 in total

Review 1.  A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: a note on the counter model.

Authors:  E J Wagenmakers; R Zeelenberg; L J Schooler; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

3.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  "Nonparametric" A' and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory.

Authors:  Richard E Pastore; Edward J Crawley; Melody S Berens; Michael A Skelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

7.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

8.  A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect.

Authors:  Conrad Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

9.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.