Literature DB >> 15237841

Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

J Sean Allen1, Joanne L Miller.   

Abstract

Recent findings in the domains of word and talker recognition reveal that listeners use previous experience with an individual talker's voice to facilitate subsequent perceptual processing of that talker's speech. These findings raise the possibility that listeners are sensitive to talker-specific acoustic-phonetic properties. The present study tested this possibility directly by examining listeners' sensitivity to talker differences in the voice-onset-time (VOT) associated with a word-initial voiceless stop consonant. Listeners were trained on the speech of two talkers. Speech synthesis was used to manipulate the VOTs of these talkers so that one had short VOTs and the other had long VOTs (counterbalanced across listeners). The results of two experiments using a paired-comparison task revealed that, when presented with a short- versus long-VOT variant of a given talker's speech, listeners could select the variant consistent with their experience of that talker's speech during training. This was true when listeners were tested on the same word heard during training and when they were tested on a different word spoken by the same talker, indicating that listeners generalized talker-specific VOT information to a novel word. Such sensitivity to talker-specific acoustic-phonetic properties may subserve at least in part listeners' capacity to benefit from talker-specific experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15237841     DOI: 10.1121/1.1701898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

5.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-08-27

8.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech.

Authors:  Sabrina K Sidaras; Jessica E D Alexander; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller; David DeSteno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.