Literature DB >> 21724419

Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components.

Judd S Day1, Daniel W MacDonald, Madeline Olsen, Charles Getz, Gerald R Williams, Steven M Kurtz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been used to treat rotator cuff tear arthropathy and proximal humerus fractures, as well as for failed conventional total shoulder prostheses. It has been suggested that polyethylene wear is potentially higher in reverse shoulder replacements than in conventional shoulder replacements. The modes and degree of polyethylene wear have not been completely elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate polyethylene wear patterns in 7 specimens retrieved at revision arthroplasty and identify factors that may be associated with increased wear.
METHODS: Reverse total shoulder components were retrieved from 7 patients during revision arthroplasty for loosening and/or pain. Preoperative glenoid tilt and placement and scapular notching were evaluated by use of preoperative radiographs. Polyethylene wear was evaluated via micro-computed tomography and optical microscopy.
RESULTS: Wear on the rim of the polyethylene humeral cup was identified on all retrieved components. The extent of rim wear varied from a penetration depth of 0.1 to 4.7 mm. We could not show a correlation between scapular notching and rim wear. However, rim wear was more extensive when the inferior screw had made contact with the liner. Metal-on-metal wear between the humeral component and the inferior screw of 1 component was also observed. Wear of the intended bearing surface was minimal. DISCUSSION: Rim damage was the predominant cause of polyethylene wear in our retrieved specimens. Direct contact between the humeral component and inferior metaglene screws is concerning because this could lead to accelerated ultra-highmolecular weight polyethylene wear and also induce mechanical loosening of the glenoid component.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724419      PMCID: PMC3189419          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

1.  Analysis of a retrieved delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  R W Nyffeler; C M L Werner; B R Simmen; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-11

Review 2.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Clément M L Werner; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Validation of a micro-CT technique for measuring volumetric wear in retrieved acetabular liners.

Authors:  A E Bowden; S M Kurtz; A A Edidin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of defect arthropathy.

Authors:  Ludwig Seebauer; Willibald Walter; Werner Keyl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses.

Authors:  R W Hood; T M Wright; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-09

9.  Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Christopher K Kepler; Shane J Nho; Edward V Craig; Russell F Warren; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Spiry; J Berhouet; C Agout; G Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Computational analysis of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reverse shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  C Quental; J Folgado; P R Fernandes; J Monteiro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

4.  Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients.

Authors:  Shennah Austen; Ilona M Punt; Jack P M Cleutjens; Paul C Willems; Steven M Kurtz; Daniel W MacDonald; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; André van Ooij
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The Influence of Different Rotator Cuff Deficiencies on Shoulder Stability Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea P Caceres; Vijay N Permeswaran; Jessica E Goetz; Carolyn M Hettrich; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre.

Authors:  Andreas Leonidou; Siddharth Virani; Christopher Buckle; Clarence Yeoh; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-20

7.  Return of Scapulohumeral Rhythm in Patients After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Midterm Stereoradiographic Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Shannon E Linderman; James R L Hall; Joshua E Johnson; Andrea P Caceres; Carolyn M Hettrich; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

8.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler J Brolin; Ryan M Cox; John G Horneff Iii; Surena Namdari; Joseph A Abboud; Kristen Nicholson; Matthew L Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  The effect of humeral polyethylene insert constraint on reverse shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics.

Authors:  Irfan Abdulla; Daniel G Langohr; Joshua W Giles; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.