Literature DB >> 35821961

Return of Scapulohumeral Rhythm in Patients After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Midterm Stereoradiographic Imaging Analysis.

Shannon E Linderman1, James R L Hall1, Joshua E Johnson1, Andrea P Caceres1,2, Carolyn M Hettrich1, Donald D Anderson1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is associated with high rates of midterm complications including scapular notching, implant wear, and mechanical impingement. Scapulo-humeral rhythm (SHR), described by Codman in the 1920's, is defined as the ratio of glenohumeral motion to scapulothoracic motion. SHR is used as an indicator of shoulder dysfunction, as alterations in SHR can have profound implications on shoulder biomechanics. The determination of SHR can be hindered by soft-tissue motion artifacts and high radiation burdens associated with traditional surface marker or fluoroscopic analysis. EOS low dose stereoradiographic imaging analysis utilizing 3D model construction from a 2D X-ray series may offer an alternative modality for characterizing SHR following RSA.
Methods: Patients (n=10) underwent an EOS imaging analysis to determine SHR at six and twelve months post-RSA. Leveraging 3D models of the implants, 2D/3D image registration methods were used to calculate relative glenohumeral and scapulothoracic positioning at 60, 90 and 120° of shoulder elevation. Subject-specific SHR curves were assessed and midterm changes in post-RSA SHR associated with follow-up time and motion phase were evaluated. Pearson correlations assessed associations between patient-specific factors and post-RSA SHR.
Results: Mean post-RSA SHR was 0.81:1 across subjects during the entire midterm postoperative period. As a cohort, post-RSA SHR was more variable for 60-90° of shoulder motion. SHR for 90-120° of motion decreased (0.43:1) at twelve months post-RSA. Post-RSA SHR could be categorized using three relative motion curve patterns, and was not strongly associated with demographic factors such as BMI. 50% of subjects demonstrated a different SHR relative motion curve shape at twelve months post-RSA, and SHR during the 90120° of motion was found to generally decrease at twelve months.
Conclusion: Midterm post-RSA SHR was successfully evaluated using EOS technology, revealing lower SHR values (i.e., greater scapulothoracic motion) compared to normal values reported in the literature. SHR continued to change for some subjects during the midterm post-RSA period, with the greatest change during 90-120° of shoulder motion. Study findings suggest that future post RSA rehabilitation efforts to address elevated scapulothoracic motion may benefit from being patient-specific in nature and targeting scapular stabilization during 90-120° of shoulder motion. Level of Evidence: IV.
Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOS imaging; Scapulohumeral rhythm; reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35821961      PMCID: PMC9210438     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  38 in total

1.  Upper trapezius muscle mechanomyographic and electromyographic activity in humans during low force fatiguing and non-fatiguing contractions.

Authors:  Pascal Madeleine; Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-07-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shoulders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome. A study using Moiré topographic analysis.

Authors:  J J Warner; L J Micheli; L E Arslanian; J Kennedy; R Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  In vivo 3-dimensional analysis of scapular kinematics: comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Kei O Matsuki; Shang Mu; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Nobuyasu Ochiai; Takahisa Sasho; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Tomoaki Toyone; Yuichi Wada; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Scott A Banks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944.

Authors:  V T Inman; J B Saunders; L C Abbott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice.

Authors:  Tamás Illés; Szabolcs Somoskeöy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

7.  A biomechanical analysis of scapular rotation during arm abduction in the scapular plane.

Authors:  S D Bagg; W J Forrest
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Scapulohumeral rhythm in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to age-matched healthy individuals.

Authors:  Hendrik Bruttel; David M Spranz; Sebastian I Wolf; Michael W Maier
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Muscle and Joint Function After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Modular Shoulder Prosthesis.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Wen Wu; Richard Thomas; Minoo Patel; Richard Page; Morgan Sangeux; Martin Richardson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components.

Authors:  Judd S Day; Daniel W MacDonald; Madeline Olsen; Charles Getz; Gerald R Williams; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.