Literature DB >> 16037962

Validation of a micro-CT technique for measuring volumetric wear in retrieved acetabular liners.

A E Bowden1, S M Kurtz, A A Edidin.   

Abstract

In this study, a novel micro-CT-based technique for evaluating wear in retrieved acetabular liners was introduced and validated. Six UHMWPE acetabular components ranging in implantation time from 2.7 to 14.4 years were collected and evaluated with the use of a high-resolution micro-CT scanner. The components were scanned with a uniform volumetric resolution of 74 microns (16-bit precision) with the use of a 1,024 x 1,024 in-plane image matrix. Manual rigid 3D image registration of the interior hemispherical portion of the acetabular cup with geometric primitives by trained observers allowed for isolation, visualization, and measurement of the wear volume. Results for these six components indicated an average wear rate of 65 mm(3)/year. Overall scanner error was quantified gravimetrically and associated with a maximum uncertainty of 0.6%. Intra-- and interobserver uncertainty analysis showed the method to be both accurate and repeatable. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2005.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037962     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  10 in total

1.  In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; David D McErlain; Jan-M Brandt; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J Macdonald; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Kirsten Stoner; Seth A Jerabek; Stephanie Tow; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Robert H Hopper; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners.

Authors:  Hee-Nee Pang; Douglas D R Naudie; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Matthew G Teeter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components.

Authors:  Judd S Day; Daniel W MacDonald; Madeline Olsen; Charles Getz; Gerald R Williams; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Polyethylene Wear Increases in Liners Articulating With Scratched Oxidized Zirconium Femoral Heads.

Authors:  Alberto Carli; Chelsea N Koch; Christina I Esposito; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Quantifying wear depth in hip prostheses using a 3D optical scanner.

Authors:  Katherine A Hollar; Daniel S Ferguson; John B Everingham; Jillian L Helms; Kevin J Warburton; Trevor J Lujan
Journal:  Wear       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.892

8.  Wear pattern observations from TDR retrievals using autoregistration of voxel data.

Authors:  Yakov P Shkolnikov; Anton Bowden; Daniel MacDonald; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Micro X-Ray Computed Tomography Mass Loss Assessment of Different UHMWPE: A Hip Joint Simulator Study on Standard vs. Cross-Linked Polyethylene.

Authors:  Saverio Affatato; Filippo Zanini; Simone Carmignato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A simple method of measuring the wear of explanted acetabular component inserts.

Authors:  L Krakow; A Klockow; E Roehner; S Brodt; H Eijer; J Bossert; G Matziolis
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.