Literature DB >> 32090146

Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Tyler J Brolin1, Ryan M Cox2, John G Horneff Iii2, Surena Namdari2, Joseph A Abboud2, Kristen Nicholson2, Matthew L Ramsey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize humeral-sided radiographic changes at a minimum of 2 years after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to determine their association with specific implantation techniques.
METHODS: The immediate and most recent postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of 120 shoulders with primary RSA and a minimum of 2-years of radiographic follow-up were analyzed (mean follow-up 35.2 months). Stress shielding was evaluated by measuring cortical thickness at 4 different locations. Three independent examiners evaluated radiographs for humeral osteolysis, radiolucent lines, stress shielding, stem loosening, and scapular notching.
RESULTS: The cortical diameter, marker of external stress shielding, significantly decreased from initial to most recent measurement (P<0.001), but did not differ between cemented and uncemented groups. Cemented stems had significantly more osteolysis and radiolucent lines; uncemented stems had significantly more internal stress shielding (P<001). The presence of scapular notching was significantly correlated with the presence of humeral osteolysis (P<0.001). Three (2.5%) stems were deemed "at risk" for loosening and 2 (1.7%) were loose.
CONCLUSION: Cemented humeral stems were associated with an increased rate of radiolucent lines and osteolysis, whereas uncemented stems were associated with more internal stress shielding. Humeral cortical thickness significantly decreased over time regardless of fixation. There was an association between scapular notching and increased humeral osteolysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adiographic changes; adiolucent line; capular notching; everse shoulder arthroplasty; steolysis; tress shielding; umeral stem loosening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090146      PMCID: PMC7007723          DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2019.36065.1951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  27 in total

1.  Radiographic assessment of cemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Sanchez-Sotelo; S W O'Driscoll; M E Torchia; R H Cofield; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 2.  Particle bioreactivity and wear-mediated osteolysis.

Authors:  Mark L Wang; Peter F Sharkey; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Long-term humeral complications after Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Ascione; Peter Domos; Vincenzo Guarrella; Mikaël Chelli; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  J Michael Wiater; James E Moravek; Matthew D Budge; Denise M Koueiter; David Marcantonio; Brett P Wiater
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler J Fox; Antonio M Foruria; Brian J Klika; John W Sperling; Cathy D Schleck; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in the Medicare population: a nationwide study of records from 2009 to 2012.

Authors:  Samuel Rosas; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Nate Formaini; Steven P Kalandiak; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Christopher K Kepler; Shane J Nho; Edward V Craig; Russell F Warren; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jochem Nagels; Mariëlle Stokdijk; Piet M Rozing
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Radiologic bone adaptations on a cementless short-stem shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; T Bradley Edwards; Allen Deutsch; Anup Shah; Thomas Bruckner; Markus Loew; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Carlos García-Fernandez; María Vallejo-Carrasco; Daniel Garriguez-Pérez; Loreto Achaerandio; Carmen Tesoro-Gonzalo; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.