Literature DB >> 33723643

Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

C Spiry1,2, J Berhouet1,2, C Agout3, G Bacle1,2, Luc Favard4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because it medializes the centre of rotation, one of the drawbacks of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the risk of impingement between the humerus and lateral border of the scapula resulting in scapular notching. The long-term impact of this notching is not well known, either on function or the risk of glenoid loosening. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze the drawbacks of this notching.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 2006, 81 patients (91 shoulders) underwent RSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis or massive cuff tear with or without osteoarthritis. This cohort was followed longitudinally with post-operative assessments done at one to two  years (T1), three to eight  years (T2), and nine+ years (T3). Before T3, 25 patients had died, nine were lost to follow-up, five  had the implants changed, and seven  had incomplete records. Thus, 45 shoulders were available for follow-up beyond nine years (mean follow-up of 12 years) and were used to determine the long-term impact of notching. Survival curves were generated using the occurrence of Sirveaux grade 3 or 4 notching and the presence of aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints.
RESULTS: The survivorship before grade 3 or 4 notching developed was 83% at five years, 60% at 10 years, and 43% at 15 years. In the end, aseptic glenoid loosening occurred in four shoulders, all of which had developed grade 4 notching. No glenoid loosening occurred in the population with grade 0, 1, 2, or 3 notching (p = 0.02). The Constant score significantly decreased between T2 and T3, although it was not different between shoulders with and without advanced notching.
CONCLUSIONS: Beyond the second year post-RSA, the number of shoulders with grade 3 or 4 notching increases steadily up to the longest follow-up. Grade 4 notching always preceded the occurrence of late glenoid loosening. The functional outcomes become significantly worse after the 9th year post-RSA, although they were not correlated to the presence of high-grade scapular notching.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiological and clinical repercussions; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Scapula; Scapular pillar

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723643     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-04998-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Istvan Hovorka
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.

Authors:  Jacques Guery; Luc Favard; François Sirveaux; Didier Oudet; Daniel Mole; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Results of Grammont's inverted prosthesis in omarthritis associated with major cuff destruction. Apropos of 16 cases].

Authors:  E Baulot; D Chabernaud; P M Grammont
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Before the Age of 60 Years: Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Aline Suter; Sabrina Catanzaro; Stefan Rahm; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Betsy M Nolan; Elizabeth Ankerson; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Impact of scapular notching on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty midterm outcomes: 5-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Ryan Simovitch; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Christopher Roche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  Derek Cuff; Derek Pupello; Nazeem Virani; Jonathan Levy; Mark Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Mario Borroni; Luigi Dubini; Stefano Gumina; Giacomo Delle Rose; Riccardo Ranieri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.