Literature DB >> 6619179

Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses.

R W Hood, T M Wright, A H Burstein.   

Abstract

A technique for the classification and quantification of damage in retrieved total knee prostheses is presented and applied to the examination of 48 removed total condylar-type knee replacements. The technique involves inspection of all metallic and polyethylene components for evidence of gross deformation, fracture, and damage to articulating surfaces. A grading system was developed to quantitate surface damage on polyethylene components. Results of the examinations are combined with patient variables (weight, activity level, radiographic findings, time of implantation, and results of histology performed on surrounding tissue) to determine correlations between clinical variables and the mechanical damage experienced by the prostheses. For the 48 total condylar-type prostheses, significant positive correlations were found for the surface damage correlated with the patient's weight and the time the prosthesis was implanted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6619179     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820170510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  64 in total

1.  Cellular response to prosthetic wear debris differs in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anant Vasudevan; Edward F DiCarlo; Timothy Wright; Dan Chen; Mark P Figgie; Steven R Goldring; Lisa A Mandl
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Markus A Wimmer; Michel P Laurent; Jeannie D Haman; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The 2012 Mark Coventry award: a retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior-stabilized tibial inserts.

Authors:  Nicholas R Paterson; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.

Authors:  Mark M Dolan; Natalie H Kelly; Joseph T Nguyen; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Wear damage in mobile-bearing TKA is as severe as that in fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Natalie H Kelly; Rose H Fu; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

Authors:  M Edmondson; A Atrey; D East; N Ellens; K Miles; R Goddard; H Apthorp; A Butler-Manuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

8.  Aggressive granulomatosis of the hip: a forgotten mode of aseptic failure.

Authors:  Pablo Ariel Isidoro Slullitel; Rodrigo Brandariz; Jose Ignacio Oñativia; German Farfalli; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga; Martin Buttaro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  In vivo oxidation contributes to delamination but not pitting in polyethylene components for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francisco J Medel; Steven M Kurtz; Javad Parvizi; Gregg R Klein; Matthew J Kraay; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.