Literature DB >> 16194746

Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Richard W Nyffeler1, Clément M L Werner, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

The presence of a notch at the inferior part of the scapular neck is a common radiographic finding in patients treated with a reverse Delta III shoulder prosthesis. It is thought that this notch is a result of mechanical contact between the polyethylene cup of the humeral implant and the inferior glenoid pole during adduction of the arm. This in vitro study assessed the effect of glenoid component positioning on glenohumeral range of motion in 8 shoulder specimens. Four different positions of the glenosphere were tested: glenosphere centered on the glenoid, leaving the inferior glenoid rim uncovered (configuration A); glenosphere flush with the inferior glenoid rim (configuration B); glenosphere extending beyond the inferior glenoid rim (configuration C); and glenosphere tilted downward 15 degrees (configuration D). The respective mean adduction and abduction angles in the scapular plane were -25 degrees and 67 degrees for configuration A, -14 degrees and 68 degrees for configuration B, -1 degrees and 81 degrees for configuration C, and -9 degrees and 75 degrees for configuration D. Placing the glenosphere distally (test configuration C) significantly improved adduction and abduction angles compared with all other test configurations (P < .001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  85 in total

1.  The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicolas J Dedy; Martin Stangenberg; Dennis Liem; Christof Hurschler; Beat Simmen; Marc Riner; Bjoern Marquardt; Joern Steinbeck
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Baulot; François Sirveaux; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Benefits of a metallic lateralized baseplate prolonged by a long metallic post in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to address glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Johanna Sekri; Jean Kany; Imen Nidtahar; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Grégory Moineau; Yannick Roussanne; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Consequences of scapular anatomy for reversed total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Pieter-Jan De Roo; Georges Van Maele; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Tony S Keller; Jonathan C Levy; William E Lee; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.