Literature DB >> 15995114

Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

C M L Werner1, P A Steinmann, M Gilbart, C Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder implant is designed to restore overhead shoulder function in the presence of irreparable rotator cuff deficiency by using the intact deltoid muscle and the stability provided by the prosthetic design. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of this arthroplasty in a consecutive series of shoulders with painful pseudoparesis due to irreversible loss of rotator cuff function.
METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe shoulder pain and active anterior elevation of <90 degrees due to an irreparable rotator cuff tear were treated with a Delta III total shoulder replacement at an average age of sixty-eight years. Seventeen of the procedures were the primary treatment for the shoulder, and forty-one were revisions. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically after an average duration of follow-up of thirty-eight months.
RESULTS: On the average, the subjective shoulder value increased from 18% preoperatively to 56% postoperatively (p < 0.0001); the relative Constant score, from 29% to 64% (p < 0.0001); the Constant score for pain, from 5.2 to 10.5 points (p < 0.0001); active anterior elevation, from 42 degrees to 100 degrees (p < 0.0001); and active abduction, from 43 degrees to 90 degrees (p < 0.0001). The patients for whom the implantation of the Delta III prosthesis was the primary procedure and those who had had previous surgery showed similar amounts of improvement. The total complication rate, including all minor complications, was 50%, and the reoperation rate was 33%. Of the seventeen primary operations, 47% (eight) were associated with a complication and 18% (three) were followed by a reoperation. Of the forty-one revisions, 51% (twenty-one) were associated with a complication and 39% (sixteen) were followed by a reoperation. Subjective results and satisfaction rates were not influenced by complications or reoperations when the prosthesis had been retained.
CONCLUSIONS: Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Delta III prosthesis is a salvage procedure for severe shoulder dysfunction caused by an irreparable rotator cuff tear associated with other glenohumeral lesions. Complications were frequent following both primary and revision procedures, but they rarely affected the final outcome. The procedure has a substantial potential to improve the condition of patients with severe shoulder dysfunction, at least in the short term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995114     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  203 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Evan L Flatow; Alicia K Harrison
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Surgical management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Brandon E Earp; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

9.  Does preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score relate to complications after total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Sonal Sodha; Juan Garzon-Muvdi; Steve A Petersen; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Quantifying rotator cuff atrophy and fatty degeneration at the supraspinatus origin in the scapular fossa.

Authors:  Hye Jin Yoo; Ja-Young Choi; Sung Hwan Hong; Eo Jin Kim; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.