Literature DB >> 21643513

Quantifying information transmission in eukaryotic gradient sensing and chemotactic response.

Bo Hu1, Wen Chen, Herbert Levine, Wouter-Jan Rappel.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells are able to sense shallow chemical gradients by surface receptors and migrate toward chemoattractant sources. The accuracy of this chemotactic response relies on the ability of cells to infer gradients from the heterogeneous distribution of receptors bound by diffusing chemical molecules. Ultimately, the precision of gradient sensing is limited by the fluctuations of signaling components, including the stochastic receptor occupancy and noisy intracellular processing. Viewing the system as a Markovian communication channel, we apply techniques from information theory to derive upper bounds on the amount of information that can be reliably transmitted through a chemotactic cell. Specifically, we derive an expression for the mutual information between the gradient direction and the spatial distribution of bound receptors. We also compute the mutual information between the gradient direction and the motility direction using three different models for cell motion. Our results can be used to quantify the information loss during the various stages of directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643513      PMCID: PMC3104692          DOI: 10.1007/s10955-011-0156-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Phys        ISSN: 0022-4715            Impact factor:   1.548


  36 in total

1.  A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells.

Authors:  M Postma; P J Van Haastert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Chemotactic cell movement during development.

Authors:  Dirk Dormann; Cornelis J Weijer
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Wen Chen; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model.

Authors:  Herbert Levine; David A Kessler; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection.

Authors:  Peter J M van Haastert; Marten Postma
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Bayesian model predicts the response of axons to molecular gradients.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Julia Feldner; Timothy Vaughan; Irina Vetter; Zac Pujic; William J Rosoff; Kevin Burrage; Peter Dayan; Linda J Richards; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phenomenological approach to eukaryotic chemotactic efficiency.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Danny Fuller; William F Loomis; Herbert Levine; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-03-08

Review 8.  The great escape: when cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and motility.

Authors:  John Condeelis; Robert H Singer; Jeffrey E Segall
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 13.827

9.  Gradient sensing in defined chemotactic fields.

Authors:  Monica Skoge; Micha Adler; Alex Groisman; Herbert Levine; William F Loomis; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  How geometry and internal bias affect the accuracy of eukaryotic gradient sensing.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Wen Chen; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-02-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  High fidelity information processing in folic acid chemotaxis of Dictyostelium amoebae.

Authors:  Igor Segota; Surin Mong; Eitan Neidich; Archana Rachakonda; Catherine J Lussenhop; Carl Franck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A framework for designing and analyzing binary decision-making strategies in cellular systems.

Authors:  Joshua R Porter; Burton W Andrews; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Cell-cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis.

Authors:  David Ellison; Andrew Mugler; Matthew D Brennan; Sung Hoon Lee; Robert J Huebner; Eliah R Shamir; Laura A Woo; Joseph Kim; Patrick Amar; Ilya Nemenman; Andrew J Ewald; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How input fluctuations reshape the dynamics of a biological switching system.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David A Kessler; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-12-20

Review 5.  Decoding the chemotactic signal.

Authors:  Monica A Thomas; Andrew B Kleist; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.962

6.  Systems biology: the role of engineering in the reverse engineering of biological signaling.

Authors:  Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.