Literature DB >> 11509347

A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells.

M Postma1, P J Van Haastert.   

Abstract

Small chemotactic cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils transduce shallow spatial chemoattractant gradients into strongly localized intracellular responses. We show that the capacity of a second messenger to establish and maintain localized signals, is mainly determined by its dispersion range, lambda = the square root of D(m)/k(-1), which must be small compared to the cell's length. Therefore, short-living second messengers (high k(-1)) with diffusion coefficients D(m) in the range of 0-5 microm(2) s(-1) are most suitable. Additional to short dispersion ranges, gradient sensing may include positive feedback mechanisms that lead to local activation and global inhibition of second-messenger production. To introduce the essential nonlinear amplification, we have investigated models in which one or more components of the signal transduction cascade translocate from the cytosol to the second messenger in the plasma membrane. A one-component model is able to amplify a 1.5-fold difference of receptor activity over the cell length into a 15-fold difference of second-messenger concentration. Amplification can be improved considerably by introducing an additional activating component that translocates to the membrane. In both models, communication between the front and the back of the cell is mediated by partial depletion of cytosolic components, which leads to both local activation and global inhibition. The results suggest that a biochemically simple and general mechanism may explain various signal localization phenomena not only in chemotactic cells but also those occurring in morphogenesis and cell differentiation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11509347      PMCID: PMC1301612          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75788-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  21 in total

Review 1.  Translocation and reversible localization of signaling proteins: a dynamic future for signal transduction.

Authors:  M N Teruel; T Meyer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The molecular genetics of chemotaxis: sensing and responding to chemoattractant gradients.

Authors:  R A Firtel; C Y Chung
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 3.  Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition.

Authors:  H Meinhardt; A Gierer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Translational diffusion of globular proteins in the cytoplasm of cultured muscle cells.

Authors:  M Arrio-Dupont; G Foucault; M Vacher; P F Devaux; S Cribier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria.

Authors:  J B Stock; A J Ninfa; A M Stock
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-12

Review 6.  Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells: a focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium.

Authors:  P N Devreotes; S H Zigmond
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1988

Review 7.  Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor.

Authors:  C H Heldin; B Westermark
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3' phosphoinositides.

Authors:  J M Haugh; F Codazzi; M Teruel; T Meyer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12-11       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate waves in Dictyostelium discoideum: a demonstration by isotope dilution--fluorography.

Authors:  K J Tomchik; P N Devreotes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate.

Authors:  N L Allbritton; T Meyer; L Stryer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  52 in total

1.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils.

Authors:  Andre Levchenko; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass.

Authors:  Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.382

3.  Spatial analysis of 3' phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts: II. Parameter estimates for individual cells from experiments.

Authors:  Ian C Schneider; Jason M Haugh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Spatial analysis of 3' phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts: I. Uniform stimulation model and bounds on dimensionless groups.

Authors:  Jason M Haugh; Ian C Schneider
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Chemotaxis: signalling modules join hands at front and tail.

Authors:  Marten Postma; Leonard Bosgraaf; Harriët M Loovers; Peter J M Van Haastert
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Chris Janetopoulos; Lan Ma; Peter N Devreotes; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells.

Authors:  Lan Ma; Chris Janetopoulos; Liu Yang; Peter N Devreotes; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Cytopede: a three-dimensional tool for modeling cell motility on a flat surface.

Authors:  Marc Herant; Micah Dembo
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.479

9.  Spatial analysis of 3' phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts, III: influence of cell morphology and morphological Polarity.

Authors:  Ian C Schneider; Elizabeth M Parrish; Jason M Haugh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing.

Authors:  R Skupsky; W Losert; R J Nossal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.