Literature DB >> 21622055

Characterization of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic-sphere phantom.

Erwan Filoux1, Jonathan Mamou, Orlando Aristizábal, Jeffrey A Ketterling.   

Abstract

The spatial resolution of high-frequency ultrasound (HFU, >20 MHz) imaging systems is usually determined using wires perpendicular to the beam. Recently, two tissue-mimicking phantoms (TMPs) were developed to estimate three-dimensional (3-D) resolution. Each TMP consists of nine 1-cm-wide slabs of tissue-mimicking material containing randomly distributed anechoic spheres. All anechoic spheres in one slab have the same dimensions, and their diameter is increased from 0.1 mm in the first slab to 1.09 mm in the last. The scattering background for one set of slabs was fabricated using 3.5-μm glass beads; the second set used 6.4-μm glass beads. The ability of a HFU system to detect these spheres against a speckle background provides a realistic estimation of its 3-D spatial resolution. In the present study, these TMPs were used with HFU systems using single-element transducers, linear arrays, and annular arrays. The TMPs were immersed in water and each slab was scanned using two commercial imaging systems and a custom HFU system based on a 5-element annular array. The annular array had a nominal center frequency of 40 MHz, a focal length of 12 mm, and a total aperture of 6 mm. A synthetic-focusing algorithm was used to form images with an increased depth-of-field. The penetration depth was increased by using a linear-chirp signal spanning 15 to 65 MHz over 4 μs. Results obtained with the custom system were compared with those of the commercial systems (40-MHz probes) in terms of sphere detection, i.e., 3-D spatial resolution, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Resulting B-mode images indicated that only the linear-array transducer failed to clearly resolve the 0.2-mm spheres, which showed that the 3-D spatial resolution of the single-element and annular-array transducers was superior to that of the linear array. The single-element transducer could only detect these spheres over a narrow 1.5 mm depth-of-field, whereas the annular array was able to detect them to depths of at least 7 mm. For any size of the anechoic spheres, the annular array excited by a chirp-coded signal provided images of the highest contrast, with a maximum CNR of 1.8 at the focus, compared with 1.3 when using impulse excitation and 1.6 with the single-element transducer and linear array. This imaging configuration also provided CNRs above 1.2 over a wide depth range of 8 mm, whereas CNRs would quickly drop below 1 outside the focal zone of the other configurations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622055      PMCID: PMC3105360          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  14 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements.

Authors:  E L Madsen; F Dong; G R Frank; B S Garra; K A Wear; T Wilson; J A Zagzebski; H L Miller; K K Shung; S H Wang; E J Feleppa; T Liu; W D O'Brien; K A Topp; N T Sanghvi; A V Zaitsev; T J Hall; J B Fowlkes; O D Kripfgans; J G Miller
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms.

Authors:  James M Kofler; Mary J Lindstrom; Frederick Kelcz; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: Basic concepts and expected benefits.

Authors:  Thanassis Misaridis; Jørgen Arendt Jensen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Cystic resolution: a performance metric for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Karthik Ranganathan; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Chirp-coded excitation imaging with a high-frequency ultrasound annular array.

Authors:  Jonathan Mamou; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Design considerations for piezoelectric polymer ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  L F Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Measurement of the ultrasonic properties of vascular tissues and blood from 35-65 MHz.

Authors:  G R Lockwood; L K Ryan; J W Hunt; F S Foster
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 1.

Authors:  M M Goodsitt; P L Carson; S Witt; D L Hykes; J M Kofler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  An annular array system for high resolution breast echography.

Authors:  M Arditi; W B Taylor; F S Foster; J W Hunt
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Generalized cystic resolution: a metric for assessing the fundamental limits on beamformer performance.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  11 in total

1.  Resolution enhancement in medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Marie Ploquin; Adrian Basarab; Denis Kouamé
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

2.  High-frequency annular array with coaxial illumination for dual-modality ultrasonic and photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Erwan Filoux; Ashwin Sampathkumar; Parag V Chitnis; Orlando Aristizábal; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.523

3.  Measuring myofiber orientations from high-frequency ultrasound images using multiscale decompositions.

Authors:  Xulei Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Correspondence - Characterization of the effective performance of a high-frequency annular-array-based imaging system using anechoic-pipe phantoms.

Authors:  Erwan Filoux; Jonathan Mamou; Carmel M Moran; Stephen D Pye; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  A Novel Quantitative 500-MHz Acoustic Microscopy System for Ophthalmologic Tissues.

Authors:  Daniel Rohrbach; Anette Jakob; Harriet O Lloyd; Steffen H Tretbar; Ronald H Silverman; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Cardiovascular Imaging in Mice.

Authors:  Colin K L Phoon; Daniel H Turnbull
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Coherence-Weighted Synthetic Focusing Applied to Photoacoustic Imaging Using a High-Frequency Annular-Array Transducer.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Orlando Aristizábal; Erwan Filoux; Ashwin Sampathkumar; Jonathan Mamou; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Synthetic-focusing strategies for real-time annular-array imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Erwan Filoux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  A flexible annular-array imaging platform for micro-ultrasound.

Authors:  Weibao Qiu; Yanyan Yu; Hamid Reza Chabok; Cheng Liu; Fu Keung Tsang; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung; Hairong Zheng; Lei Sun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Ultrasound backscatter microscopy for imaging of oral carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Lam; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Yang Sun; Feifei Zhou; Allison Dobbie; Regina F Gandour-Edwards; Steve P Tinling; D Gregory Farwell; Wayne L Monsky; K Kirk Shung; Laura Marcu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.