Literature DB >> 19213634

Generalized cystic resolution: a metric for assessing the fundamental limits on beamformer performance.

Drake A Guenther1, William F Walker.   

Abstract

Existing methods for characterizing the imaging performance of ultrasound systems do not clearly quantify the impact of contrast, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Although the beamplot, contrast resolution metrics, SNR measurements, ideal observer methods, and contrast-detail analysis provide useful information, it remains difficult to discern how changes in system parameters affect these metrics and clinical imaging performance. In this paper, we present a rigorous methodology for characterizing the pulse-echo imaging performance of arbitrary ultrasound systems. Our metric incorporates the 4-D spatio-temporal system response, which is defined as a function of the individual beamformer channel weights. The metric also incorporates the individual beamformer channel electronic SNR. Whereas earlier performance measures dealt solely with contrast resolution or echo signal-to-noise ratio, our metric combines them so that tradeoffs between these parameters are easily distinguishable. The new metric quantifies an arbitrary system's contrast resolution and SNR performance as a function of cyst size, beamformer channel weights, and beamformer channel SNR. We present a theoretical derivation of the unified performance metric and provide simulation and experimental results highlighting the metric's utility. We compare the fundamental performance limits of 2 beamforming strategies: the dynamic focus finite impulse response (FIR) filter beamformer and the spatial matched filter (SMF) beamformer to the performance of the conventional delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer. Results from this study show that the SMF beamformer and the FIR beamformer offer significant gains in beamformer SNR and contrast resolution compared with the DAS beamformer, respectively. The metric clearly distinguishes the performance of the SMF beamformer, which enhances system sensitivity, from the FIR beamformer, which optimizes system contrast resolution. Finally, the metric provides one quantitative goal for optimizing a broadband beamformer?s contrast resolution performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19213634      PMCID: PMC2755266          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  12 in total

1.  Broadband optimal contrast resolution beamforming.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms.

Authors:  James M Kofler; Mary J Lindstrom; Frederick Kelcz; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Mark D Parry; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part II: simulation results.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part I: theory.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Cystic resolution: a performance metric for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Karthik Ranganathan; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  SNR comparisons of beamforming strategies.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Kang-Sik Kim; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Roger J Zemp; Jie Liu; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound.

Authors:  R F Wagner; M F Insana; D G Brown
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  A contrast-detail analysis of diagnostic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  S W Smith; H Lopez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrasonic multipath and beamforming clutter reduction: a chirp model approach.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Marko Jakovljevic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Linear System Models for Ultrasonic Imaging: Intensity Signal Statistics.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Yang Zhu; Sara Bahramian; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Characterization of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic-sphere phantom.

Authors:  Erwan Filoux; Jonathan Mamou; Orlando Aristizábal; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Robust finite impulse response beamforming applied to medical ultrasound.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Histogram Matching for Visual Ultrasound Image Comparison.

Authors:  Nick Bottenus; Brett C Byram; Dongwoon Hyun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.