Literature DB >> 29414719

Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Thomas Bowling1, Julien Meaud2.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions are sounds that are emitted by the cochlea due to the nonlinearity of the outer hair cells. These emissions play an important role both in clinical settings and research laboratories. However, how distortion products propagate from their generation location to the middle ear remains unclear; whether distortion products propagate as a slow reverse traveling wave, or as a fast compression wave, through the cochlear fluid has been debated. In this article, we evaluate the contributions of the slow reverse wave and fast compression wave to the propagation of intracochlear distortion products using a physiologically based nonlinear model of the gerbil cochlea. This model includes a 3D two-duct model of the intracochlear fluid and a realistic model of outer hair cell biophysics. Simulations of the distortion products in the cochlear fluid pressure in response to a two-tone stimulus are compared with published in vivo experimental results. Whereas experiments have characterized distortion products at a limited number of locations, this model provides a complete description of the fluid pressure at all locations in the cochlear ducts. As in experiments, the spatial variations of the distortion products in the fluid pressure have some similarities with what is observed in response to a pure tone. Analysis of the fluid pressure demonstrates that although a fast wave component is generated, the slow wave component dominates the response. Decomposition of the model simulations into forward and reverse wave components shows that a slow forward propagating wave is generated due to the reflection of the slow reverse wave at the stapes. Wave interference between the reverse and forward components sometimes complicates the analysis of distortion products propagation using measurements at a few locations.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29414719      PMCID: PMC5985034          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  59 in total

1.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Intracochlear Scala Media Pressure Measurement: Implications for Models of Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sushrut S Kale; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A mechano-electro-acoustical model for the cochlea: response to acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Niranjan V Deo; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Morphology of the unfixed cochlea.

Authors:  R M Edge; B N Evans; M Pearce; C P Richter; X Hu; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Force generation in the outer hair cell of the cochlea.

Authors:  K H Iwasa; M Adachi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Consequences of Location-Dependent Organ of Corti Micro-Mechanics.

Authors:  Yanju Liu; Sheryl M Gracewski; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inner hair cell stereocilia displacement in response to focal stimulation of the basilar membrane in the ex vivo gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Zosuls; Laura C Rupprecht; David C Mountain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reducing tectorial membrane viscoelasticity enhances spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and compromises the detection of low level sound.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Charlsie Lemons; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A role for tectorial membrane mechanics in activating the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  Amir Nankali; Yi Wang; Clark Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.