Literature DB >> 12880039

Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Christopher A Shera1.   

Abstract

Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) have been suggested to arise by three different mechanisms. The local-oscillator model, dating back to the work of Thomas Gold, supposes that SOAEs arise through the local, autonomous oscillation of some cellular constituent of the organ of Corti (e.g., the "active process" underlying the cochlear amplifier). Two other models, by contrast, both suppose that SOAEs are a global collective phenomenon--cochlear standing waves created by multiple internal reflection--but differ on the nature of the proposed power source: Whereas the "passive" standing-wave model supposes that SOAEs are biological noise, passively amplified by cochlear standing-wave resonances acting as narrow-band nonlinear filters, the "active" standing-wave model supposes that standing-wave amplitudes are actively maintained by coherent wave amplification within the cochlea. Quantitative tests of key predictions that distinguish the local-oscillator and global standing-wave models are presented and shown to support the global standing-wave model. In addition to predicting the existence of multiple emissions with a characteristic minimum frequency spacing, the global standing-wave model accurately predicts the mean value of this spacing, its standard deviation, and its power-law dependence on SOAE frequency. Furthermore, the global standing-wave model accounts for the magnitude, sign, and frequency dependence of changes in SOAE frequency that result from modulations in middle-ear stiffness. Although some of these SOAE characteristics may be replicable through artful ad hoc adjustment of local-oscillator models, they all arise quite naturally in the standing-wave framework. Finally, the statistics of SOAE time waveforms demonstrate that SOAEs are coherent, amplitude-stabilized signals, as predicted by the active standing-wave model. Taken together, the results imply that SOAEs are amplitude-stabilized standing waves produced by the cochlea acting as a biological, hydromechanical analog of a laser oscillator. Contrary to recent claims, spontaneous emission of sound from the ear does not require the autonomous mechanical oscillation of its cellular constituents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880039     DOI: 10.1121/1.1575750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  68 in total

1.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Frank Jülicher; Pascal Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; K Grosh; J Zheng; E de Boer; Y Zou; T Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

Review 6.  Do forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

7.  Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-21

8.  A canonical oscillator model of cochlear dynamics.

Authors:  Karl D Lerud; Ji Chul Kim; Felix V Almonte; Laurel H Carney; Edward W Large
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A methodology for detecting field potentials from the external ear canal: NEER and EVestG.

Authors:  Brian Lithgow
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.