Literature DB >> 23556591

Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Christopher A Shera1, Nigel P Cooper.   

Abstract

At low stimulus levels, basilar-membrane (BM) mechanical transfer functions in sensitive cochleae manifest a quasiperiodic rippling pattern in both amplitude and phase. Analysis of the responses of active cochlear models suggests that the rippling is a mechanical interference pattern created by multiple internal reflection within the cochlea. In models, the interference arises when reverse-traveling waves responsible for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) reflect off the stapes on their way to the ear canal, launching a secondary forward-traveling wave that combines with the primary wave produced by the stimulus. Frequency-dependent phase differences between the two waves then create the rippling pattern measurable on the BM. Measurements of BM ripples and SFOAEs in individual chinchilla ears demonstrate that the ripples are strongly correlated with the acoustic interference pattern measured in ear-canal pressure, consistent with a common origin involving the generation of SFOAEs. In BM responses to clicks, the ripples appear as temporal fine structure in the response envelope (multiple lobes, waxing and waning). Analysis of the ripple spacing and response phase gradients provides a test for the role of fast- and slow-wave modes of reverse energy propagation within the cochlea. The data indicate that SFOAE delays are consistent with reverse slow-wave propagation but much too long to be explained by fast waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556591      PMCID: PMC4109360          DOI: 10.1121/1.4792129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  An improved heterodyne laser interferometer for use in studies of cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  N P Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Intensity-invariance of fine time structure in basilar-membrane click responses: implications for cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A ripple effect in the audiogram.

Authors:  E ELLIOTT
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1958-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-21

7.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  A Recio; N C Rich; S S Narayan; M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Iterated intracochlear reflection shapes the envelopes of basilar-membrane click responses.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

3.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

6.  Spatial irregularities of sensitivity along the organ of Corti of the cochlea.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Negative-delay sources in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Christopher A Shera; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Temporal Suppression of Clicked-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Basilar-Membrane Motion in Gerbils.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2018-05-31

9.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.