Literature DB >> 2030216

Reflection of retrograde waves within the cochlea and at the stapes.

C A Shera1, G Zweig.   

Abstract

A number of authors [de Boer and Viergever, Hear. Res. 13, 101-112 (1984); de Boer et al., in Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986); Hear. Res. 23, 1-7 (1986); Viergever, in Auditory Frequency Selectivity (Plenum, New York, 1986), pp. 31-38; Kaernbach et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 408-411 (1987)] have argued that backward-traveling waves, in striking contrast to waves traveling forward towards the helicotrema, suffer appreciable reflection as they move through the basal turns of the cochlea. Such reflection, if present, would have important consequences for understanding the nature and strength of otoacoustic emissions. The apparent asymmetry in reflection of cochlear waves is shown, however, to be an artifact of the boundary condition those authors impose at the stapes: conventional cochlear models are found not to generate reflections of waves traveling in either direction even when the wavelength changes rapidly and the WKB approximation breaks down. Although backward-traveling waves are not reflected by the secular variation of the geometrical and mechanical characteristics of the cochlea, they are reflected when they reach the stapes. The magnitude of that boundary reflection is computed for the cat and shown to be a large, rapidly varying function of frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030216     DOI: 10.1121/1.400654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Iterated intracochlear reflection shapes the envelopes of basilar-membrane click responses.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Do forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Negative-delay sources in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Christopher A Shera; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.