Literature DB >> 22580949

Waves on Reissner's membrane: a mechanism for the propagation of otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea.

Tobias Reichenbach1, Aleksandra Stefanovic, Fumiaki Nin, A J Hudspeth.   

Abstract

Sound is detected and converted into electrical signals within the ear. The cochlea not only acts as a passive detector of sound, however, but can also produce tones itself. These otoacoustic emissions are a striking manifestation of the cochlea's mechanical active process. A controversy remains of how these mechanical signals propagate back to the middle ear, from which they are emitted as sound. Here, we combine theoretical and experimental studies to show that mechanical signals can be transmitted by waves on Reissner's membrane, an elastic structure within the cochlea. We develop a theory for wave propagation on Reissner's membrane and its role in otoacoustic emissions. Employing a scanning laser interferometer, we measure traveling waves on Reissner's membrane in the gerbil, guinea pig, and chinchilla. The results are in accord with the theory and thus support a role for Reissner's membrane in otoacoustic emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580949      PMCID: PMC3348656          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  46 in total

1.  Nonlinearity in the apical turn of living guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  S M Khanna; L F Hao
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Amplification in the apical turn of the cochlea with negative feedback.

Authors:  S M Khanna; L F Hao
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Supporting evidence for reverse cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  W Dong; E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Mechanical responses of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M Ulfendahl
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes.

Authors:  John Cormack; Yanju Liu; Jong-Hoon Nam; Sheryl M Gracewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fgf10 is required for specification of non-sensory regions of the cochlear epithelium.

Authors:  Lisa D Urness; Xiaofen Wang; Shumei Shibata; Takahiro Ohyama; Suzanne L Mansour
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  An unusually powerful mode of low-frequency sound interference due to defective hair bundles of the auditory outer hair cells.

Authors:  Kazusaku Kamiya; Vincent Michel; Fabrice Giraudet; Brigitte Riederer; Isabelle Foucher; Samantha Papal; Isabelle Perfettini; Sébastien Le Gal; Elisabeth Verpy; Weiliang Xia; Ursula Seidler; Maria-Magdalena Georgescu; Paul Avan; Aziz El-Amraoui; Christine Petit
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A cochlear-bone wave can yield a hearing sensation as well as otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Tatjana Tchumatchenko; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  A clinically oriented introduction and review on finite element models of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kikidis; Athanasios Bibas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-22

7.  Hydromechanical Structure of the Cochlea Supports the Backward Traveling Wave in the Cochlea In Vivo.

Authors:  Fangyi Chen; Dingjun Zha; Xiaojie Yang; Allyn Hubbard; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  The origin of mechanical harmonic distortion within the organ of Corti in living gerbil cochleae.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-08-25

9.  Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W He; T Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Toward a neuromorphic microphone.

Authors:  Leslie S Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.