Literature DB >> 31369471

Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Sara E Fultz1, Kenneth I Vaden2, Daniel M Rasetshwane1, Judy G Kopun1, Stephen T Neely1, Judy R Dubno2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to assess effects of age on CR in adults and interactions among age, sex, and hearing loss.
DESIGN: Data were collected from 60 adults selected for their age (e.g., 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 years) and normal middle ear status. A wideband noise stimulus presented at three stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB SPL) was used to elicit CR. Half-octave bands of CR signal magnitude (CRM), CR noise, and the CR signal-to-noise ratio (CR-SNR) were extracted from the wideband CR response. Regression analyses were conducted to assess interactions among CR, age, sex, and pure-tone thresholds at closely matched frequency bands across stimulus levels.
RESULTS: Although increased age was generally associated with lower CRM and CR-SNR at some band frequencies and stimulus levels, no significant effects of age remained after controlling for effects of pure-tone thresholds. Increases in pure-tone thresholds were associated with lower CRM and CR-SNR at most frequency bands and stimulus levels. Effects of hearing sensitivity were significant at some frequencies and levels after controlling for age and sex.
CONCLUSIONS: When effects of age were controlled, adults with better hearing had significantly larger CRM and CR-SNR than those with poorer hearing. In contrast, when effects of hearing were controlled, no significant effects of age on CRM and CR-SNR remained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31369471      PMCID: PMC7386826          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  27 in total

1.  Noise-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  B Maat; H P Wit; P van Dijk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evidence against the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  A L Strouse; M T Ochs; J W Hall
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert; Fu-Shing Lee; Lois J Matthews; Richard A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-06

8.  Aging and middle ear resonance.

Authors:  T L Wiley; K J Cruickshanks; D M Nondahl; T S Tweed
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use.

Authors:  David T Kemp
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Reliability and clinical test performance of cochlear reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.