| Literature DB >> 11831802 |
MacKenzie A Howard1, Barden B Stagner, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin, Glen K Martin.
Abstract
Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f1-f2 can be suppressed by the introduction of a third "suppressor" tone. Plotting the suppression of the DPOAE level against the changing frequency and level of the suppressor produces frequency-tuning functions referred to as suppression tuning curves (STCs). The dominant features of STCs, including their shape, are similar to the features of neural tuning curves (NTCs) recorded from single auditory nerve fibers. However, recent findings using reversible diuretics suggest that STCs do not provide the same measure of cochlear frequency selectivity as provided by NTCs. To determine if STCs are also insensitive to the adverse effects of excessive sounds, the present study exposed rabbits to a moderate-level noise that produced temporary threshold shift-like (TTS) effects on DPOAEs, and examined the influence of such exposures on STCs. DPOAEs were produced using primary tones with geometric-mean frequencies centered at 2.8 or 4 kHz, and with L1 and L2 values of 45/45, 50/35, 50/50, and 55/45 dB SPL. STCs were obtained before and during recovery for a period of approximately 2 h immediately following, and at 1, 2, 3, and 7 d post-exposure to a 2 kHz octave band noise, at levels and durations sufficient to cause significant but reversible reductions in DPOAE levels. STC data included tip center frequency, tip threshold, and Q10dB measures of tuning for suppression criteria of 3, 6, 9, and 12 dB. Recovery was variable between animals, but all rabbits recovered fully by 7 d post-exposure. STC center frequencies measured during the TTS typically tuned to a slightly higher frequency, while tip thresholds tended to decrease and Q10dB increase. Together, the results indicate that, despite similarities in the general properties of STCs and NTCs, these two types of tuning curves are affected differently following reversible cochlear insult.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11831802 DOI: 10.1121/1.1419094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acoust Soc Am ISSN: 0001-4966 Impact factor: 1.840