Literature DB >> 11051505

Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas.

P F Fahey1, B B Stagner, B L Lonsbury-Martin, G K Martin.   

Abstract

Suppression and/or enhancement of third- and fifth-order distortion products by a third tone that can have a frequency more than an octave above and a level more than 40 dB below the primary tones have recently been measured by Martin et al. [Hear. Res. 136, 105-123 (1999)]. Contours of iso-suppression and iso-enhancement that are plotted as a function of third-tone frequency and level are called interference response areas. After ruling out order aliasing, two possible mechanisms for this effect have been developed, a harmonic mechanism and a catalyst mechanism. The harmonic mechanism produces distortion products by mixing a harmonic of one of the primary tones with the other primary tone. The catalyst mechanism produces distortion products by mixing one or more intermediate distortion products that are produced by the third tone with one or more of the input tones. The harmonic mechanism does not need a third tone and the catalyst mechanism does. Because the basilar membrane frequency response is predicted to affect each of these mechanisms differently, it is concluded that the catalyst mechanism will be dominant in the high-frequency regions of the cochlea and the harmonic mechanism will have significant strength in the low-frequency regions of the cochlea. The mechanisms are dependent on the existence of both even- and odd-order distortion, and significant even- and odd-order distortion have been measured in the experimental animals. Furthermore, the nonlinear part of the cochlear mechanical response must be well into saturation when input tones are 50 or more dB SPL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11051505     DOI: 10.1121/1.1308048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Two-tone distortion in intracochlear pressure.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Source of level dependent minima in rabbit distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Nicole M Scherrer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparing Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Intracochlear Distortion Products Inferred from a Noninvasive Assay.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Wei Dong; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.