Literature DB >> 3654389

Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.

G K Martin1, B L Lonsbury-Martin, R Probst, S A Scheinin, A C Coats.   

Abstract

Previous work on acoustic distortion products (DPs) recorded from the ear canal has not established unequivocally whether emitted DPs principally reflect basilar-membrane nonlinearities at the frequency sites of the primary tones, f1 and f2, or if the DP-frequency place itself makes a significant contribution to the emitted response. Results from some studies on acoustic emissions attribute generation of the emitted DP almost exclusively to the regions of maximum primary-tone interaction, while the findings of other investigations implicate reemission of the response from the DP locus as a significant contributor to response magnitude. Using suppression, interfering tones, and temporary threshold shift (TTS) procedures, the work reported here was designed to establish more definitively the precise contributions of the basilar-membrane regions involved in generating acoustic DPs in rabbits. Suppression tuning curves and interfering-tone experiments indicated that for the DP at 2f1-f2, regions near the f1 or f2 frequencies were the major contributors to the emitted response. However, for the higher-frequency DP at 2f2-f1, the basilar-membrane region just basal to the DP site was implicated as the generator. Following brief episodes of TTS at frequencies related to either the DP or the primary tones, the locus of the exposure stimulus that most effectively reduced the magnitude of the 2f1-f2 response also implicated the region of maximal primary-tone interaction in the generation of the acoustic DP. In contrast, for the DP at 2f2-f1, basilar-membrane sites nearer the DP were identified as the primary contributors to the emitted response. Both sets of results imply that different DPs recorded from the ear canal may originate from unique regions of primary-tone interaction along the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3654389     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90049-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Source of level dependent minima in rabbit distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission test performance for ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett McMillan; Donald Austin; Frederick Gallun; Stephen A Fausti; Jane S Gordon; Wendy J Helt; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vasospasm of labyrinthine artery in cerebellopontine angle surgery: evidence brought by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thierry Mom; Audrey Montalban; Toufic Khalil; Jean Gabrillargues; Jean Chazal; Laurent Gilain; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in the hedgehog tenrec, Echinops telfairi.

Authors:  Markus Drexl; Michael Faulstich; Boris Von Stebut; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.