Literature DB >> 33003861

A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.

Anders T Christensen1, Carolina Abdala1, Christopher A Shera1.   

Abstract

The apical and basal regions of the cochlea appear functionally distinct. In humans, compelling evidence for an apical-basal transition derives from the phase of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), whose frequency dependence differs at low and high frequencies. Although OAEs arising from the two major source mechanisms (distortion and reflection) both support the existence of an apical-basal transition-as identified via a prominent bend (or "break") in OAE phase slope-the two OAE types disagree about its precise location along the cochlea. Whereas distortion OAEs at frequency 2f1-f2 suggest that the apical-basal transition occurs near the 2.5 kHz place, reflection OAEs locate the transition closer to 1 kHz. To address this discrepancy, distortion and reflection OAEs were measured and analyzed in 20 young human adults from 0.25-8 kHz and at eight primary-frequency ratios f2/f1 in the range 1-1.5. Break frequencies and OAE phase-gradient delays were estimated by fitting segmented linear models to the unwrapped phase. When distortion- and reflection-OAE phase are considered as functions of ln f2-that is, as linear functions of the location of their putative site of generation within the cochlea-the analysis identifies not just two but three main cochlear segments, meeting at transition frequencies of approximately 0.9 and 2.6 kHz, whose locations are largely independent both of primary-frequency ratio and emission type. A simple model incorporating an abrupt transition from wave- to place-fixed behavior near the middle of the cochlea accounts for key features of distortion-OAE phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33003861      PMCID: PMC7789857          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Frequency glides in the impulse responses of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  L H Carney; M J McDuffy; I Shekhter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission reflection-component delays and cochlear tuning: estimates from across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; François Guérit; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phase-locked responses to tones of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers: implications for apical cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-17

9.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  Extended low-frequency phase of the distortion-product otoacoustic emission in human newborns.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Christopher A Shera; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.