| Literature DB >> 21525648 |
Manikandan Karuppasamy1, Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl, Milos Vulovic, Abraham J Koster, Raimond B G Ravelli.
Abstract
<span class="Disease">Radiation damagen> is an important resolution limiting factor both in macromolecular X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. Systematic studies in macromolecular X-ray crystallography greatly benefited from the use of dose, expressed as energy deposited per mass unit, which is derived from parameters including incident flux, beam energy, beam size, sample composition and sample size. In here, the use of dose is reintroduced for electron microscopy, accounting for the electron energy, incident flux and measured sample thickness and composition. Knowledge of the amount of energy deposited allowed us to compare doses with experimental limits in macromolecular X-ray crystallography, to obtain an upper estimate of radical concentrations that build up in the vitreous sample, and to translate heat-transfer simulations carried out for macromolecular X-ray crystallography to cryo-electron microscopy. Stroboscopic exposure <span class="Chemical">series of 50-250 images were collected for different incident flux densities and integration times from <span class="Species">Lumbricus terrestris extracellular hemoglobin. The images within each series were computationally aligned and analyzed with similarity metrics such as Fourier ring correlation, Fourier ring phase residual and figure of merit. Prior to gas bubble formation, the images become linearly brighter with dose, at a rate of approximately 0.1% per 10 MGy. The gradual decomposition of a vitrified hemoglobin sample could be visualized at a series of doses up to 5500 MGy, by which dose the sample was sublimed. Comparison of equal-dose series collected with different incident flux densities showed a dose-rate effect favoring lower flux densities. Heat simulations predict that sample heating will only become an issue for very large dose rates (50 e(-)Å(-2) s(-1) or higher) combined with poor thermal contact between the grid and cryo-holder. Secondary radiolytic effects are likely to play a role in dose-rate effects. Stroboscopic data collection combined with an improved understanding of the effects of dose and dose rate will aid single-particle cryo-electron microscopists to have better control of the outcome of their experiments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21525648 PMCID: PMC3083915 DOI: 10.1107/S090904951100820X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat ISSN: 0909-0495 Impact factor: 2.616
Mass loss upon electron-beam irradiation
| Solvent, estimated number of Hb molecules (Hb µm−2), sample thickness (nm) | Incident flux density (e Å−2 s−1), integration time (s), dose per exposure (MGy) | Δ | Beam-induced movements [pixels (std)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 m | 5, 1, 5.7 | 1420 | 0.915 | 4.2 (3.0) |
| 1457 | 0.937 | 2.1 (1.6) | ||
| 1240 | 0.921 | 4.9 (3.7) | ||
| 1, 1, 1.1 | 306 | 1.02 | 3.6 (2.7) | |
| 307 | 0.949 | 2.8 (2.1) | ||
| 298 | 1.03 | 5.3 (4.4) | ||
| 50, 1, 56.5 | 18543 | 0.9 (0.8) | ||
| 50 m | 5, 1, 5.4 | 1056 | 0.515 | 2.3 (1.8) |
| 1028 | 0.479 | 5.5 (3.0) | ||
| 1027 | 0.453 | 5.2 (3.5) | ||
| 998 | 0.456 | 5.5 (3.3) | ||
| 1, 1, 1.1 | 281 | 0.968 | 2.8 (2.0) | |
| 289 | 0.966 | 3.1 (3.2) | ||
| 281 | 0.969 | 2.6 (1.9) | ||
| 50 m | 5, 1, 5.0 | 1234 | 0.719 | 2.8 (2.1) |
| 1134 | 0.735 | 2.9 (2.1) | ||
| 1184 | 0.700 | 5.0 (3.4) | ||
| 1, 1, 1.0 | 406 | 1.97 | 8.8 (5.4) | |
| 429 | 1.65 | 8.8 (5.4) | ||
| 428 | 1.63 | 7.3 (4.4) | ||
| 50 m | 5, 1, 5.5 | 2083 | 0.898 | 2.0 (1.8) |
| 2025 | 0.887 | 2.9 (2.1) | ||
| 2075 | 1.07 | 3.7 (2.8) | ||
| 2132 | 0.953 | 2.4 (2.0) | ||
| 2115 | 0.978 | 2.7 (1.8) | ||
| 50, 0.1, 5.5 | 1996 | 0.862 | 6.9 (4.9) | |
| 2009 | 0.707 | 5.6 (4.5) | ||
| 1886 | 0.905 | 2.5 (2.2) | ||
| 1910 | 0.860 | 3.4 (2.3) | ||
| 1987 | 0.878 | 2.7 (2.0) | ||
| 50, 1, 55.4 | 19359 | 0.9 (0.7) | ||
| 50 m | 50, 0.1, 5.0 | 1422 | 0.956 | 3.3 (2.7) |
| 1403 | 0.874 | 3.0 (3.0) | ||
| 1369 | 1.11 | 1.9 (1.6) | ||
| 1304 | 1.10 | 2.1 (1.4) | ||
| 1396 | 1.07 | 4.2 (4.0) | ||
| 2 | 5, 1, 4.7 | 1494 | 1.03 | 5.0 (4.0) |
| 1517 | 0.973 | |||
| 1452 | 0.928 | |||
| 1469 | 0.976 | |||
| 1458 | 0.942 | |||
| 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 120, 150 | 5, 1, 5.5 | 1547 | 0.217 | 8.2 (6.1) |
| 1417 | 0.384 | |||
| 1593 | 0.291 | |||
| 50% glycerol, | 5, 1, 5.4 | 1566 | 53.9, 89.5 |
The correlation coefficients for all linear fits are around 0.99.
First and last images within each series were compared.
The glycerol sample showed large movements of the fiducial gold markers.
The two values correspond to the first to the fifth, and the first to the tenth image of the series, respectively.
Figure 1Normalized intensity change as a function of dose for different exposure series. LF refers to the low-flux series (1 e Å−2 s−1), MF to medium-flux (5 e Å−2 s−1) and HF to high-flux (50 e Å−2 s−1). The normalized intensity change was found to be linear with dose as shown by least-squares fit to the data.
Figure 2Plots of radial-averaged cosine phase error versus resolution for different dose rates. (a) Radial-averaged FOMs are given for a medium-flux series on Hb in a low-salt sample for integrated flux densities of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 e Å−2. (b) Close-up of (a) showing the first and second zero crossing of the CTF for a defocus of −3.37 µm. Radial-averaged FOMs for (c) the low-flux and (d) high-flux short-exposure series.
Figure 3Fourier ring phase residual (FRPR) and Fourier ring correlation (FRC) as a function of dose. Medium-flux data were combined in groups of three images, corresponding to an integrated flux density of 15 e Å−2 per combined image. The first combined image was used as a reference.
Figure 4Qualitative investigation of the dose-rate effect. The aligned and summed images of (a) and (e) low-flux, (b) and (f) medium-flux, (c) and (g) high-flux, and (d) and (h) high-flux short-exposure series are shown at two different integrated flux densities of (a)–(d) 50 e Å−2 and (e)–(h) 250 e Å−2, respectively. The scale bar shown in (a) corresponds to 30 nm.
Figure 5Beam-induced ice crystallization at a high-flux rate (50 e Å−2 s−1). Images (a)–(d) were all taken in the same series and correspond to doses of 57, 565, 1695 and 2825 MGy, respectively. The beam-induced movement calculated for the fiducial gold markers in these images is surprisingly small (see Table 1 ▶, grid 1, high-flux series). The scale bar shown in (a) corresponds to 60 nm.
Figure 6Simulations of the heating of a vitreous sample by the electron beam. (a) Temperature versus time plot for a lumped system model for three different heat-transfer coefficients h. The adiabatic model temperature rise is shown in comparison. One-dimensional heat-diffusion plots for a distributed model are shown for (b) medium- and (c) high-flux incident beam for a low heat-transfer coefficient of 800 W m−2 K−1.
Figure 7Low-magnification image of Hb sample in 50% (v/v) glycerol before and after the collection of a medium-flux series data. The hole (sized 1.2 µm) in the carbon support film contains a thin layer of vitreous sample in the before image, which is completely destroyed after the collection of 50 images, corresponding to a dose of 270 MGy.
Figure 8Representative high-flux images from (a) the first and (b) the 12th exposure from a 0.2% glutaraldehyde sample. Clear bubbling can be observed on every protein particle. The scale bar shown in (a) corresponds to 30 nm.