Literature DB >> 32207947

Flexible Fitting of Small Molecules into Electron Microscopy Maps Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Neural Network Potentials.

John W Vant1, Shae-Lynn J Lahey2, Kalyanashis Jana3, Mrinal Shekhar1,4, Daipayan Sarkar1, Barbara H Munk1, Ulrich Kleinekathöfer3, Sumit Mittal1,5, Christopher Rowley2, Abhishek Singharoy1.   

Abstract

Despite significant advances in resolution, the potential for cryo-electron microscopy (EM) to be used in determining the structures of protein-drug complexes remains unrealized. Determination of accurate structures and coordination of bound ligands necessitates simultaneous fitting of the models into the density envelopes, exhaustive sampling of the ligand geometries, and, most importantly, concomitant rearrangements in the side chains to optimize the binding energy changes. In this article, we present a flexible-fitting pipeline where molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF) is used to refine structures of protein-ligand complexes from 3 to 5 Å electron density data. Enhanced sampling is employed to explore the binding pocket rearrangements. To provide a model that can accurately describe the conformational dynamics of the chemically diverse set of small-molecule drugs inside MDFF, we use QM/MM and neural-network potential (NNP)/MM models of protein-ligand complexes, where the ligand is represented using the QM or NNP model, and the protein is represented using established molecular mechanical force fields (e.g., CHARMM). This pipeline offers structures commensurate to or better than recently submitted high-resolution cryo-EM or X-ray models, even when given medium to low-resolution data as input. The use of the NNPs makes the algorithm more robust to the choice of search models, offering a radius of convergence of 6.5 Å for ligand structure determination. The quality of the predicted structures was also judged by density functional theory calculations of ligand strain energy. This strain potential energy is found to systematically decrease with better fitting to density and improved ligand coordination, indicating correct binding interactions. A computationally inexpensive protocol for computing strain energy is reported as part of the model analysis protocol that monitors both the ligand fit as well as model quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32207947      PMCID: PMC7311632          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  55 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Antibody structure determination using a combination of homology modeling, energy-based refinement, and loop prediction.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Tyler Day; Dora Warshaviak; Colleen Murrett; Richard Friesner; David Pearlman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-04-16

3.  Rapid parameterization of small molecules using the Force Field Toolkit.

Authors:  Christopher G Mayne; Jan Saam; Klaus Schulten; Emad Tajkhorshid; James C Gumbart
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  CHARMM-GUI MDFF/xMDFF Utilizer for Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting Simulations in Various Environments.

Authors:  Yifei Qi; Jumin Lee; Abhishek Singharoy; Ryan McGreevy; Klaus Schulten; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data.

Authors:  Gunnar F Schröder; Michael Levitt; Axel T Brunger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Features and development of Coot.

Authors:  P Emsley; B Lohkamp; W G Scott; K Cowtan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

7.  Improved cryoEM-Guided Iterative Molecular Dynamics--Rosetta Protein Structure Refinement Protocol for High Precision Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  High-resolution structure determination of sub-100 kDa complexes using conventional cryo-EM.

Authors:  Mark A Herzik; Mengyu Wu; Gabriel C Lander
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps.

Authors:  Thomas C Terwilliger; Paul D Adams; Pavel V Afonine; Oleg V Sobolev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Deep Learning to Predict Protein Backbone Structure from High-Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps.

Authors:  Dong Si; Spencer A Moritz; Jonas Pfab; Jie Hou; Renzhi Cao; Liguo Wang; Tianqi Wu; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Faces of Contemporary CryoEM Information and Modeling.

Authors:  Giulia Palermo; Yuji Sugita; Willy Wriggers; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  CryoFold: determining protein structures and data-guided ensembles from cryo-EM density maps.

Authors:  Mrinal Shekhar; Genki Terashi; Chitrak Gupta; Daipayan Sarkar; Gaspard Debussche; Nicholas J Sisco; Jonathan Nguyen; Arup Mondal; John Vant; Petra Fromme; Wade D Van Horn; Emad Tajkhorshid; Daisuke Kihara; Ken Dill; Alberto Perez; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Matter       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Energy landscape of the SARS-CoV-2 reveals extensive conformational heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ghoncheh Mashayekhi; John Vant; Abhigna Polavarapu; Abbas Ourmazd; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Curr Res Struct Biol       Date:  2022-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.