Literature DB >> 19240332

Room-temperature scavengers for macromolecular crystallography: increased lifetimes and modified dose dependence of the intensity decay.

Adam I Barker1, Robert J Southworth-Davies, Karthik S Paithankar, Ian Carmichael, Elspeth F Garman.   

Abstract

The advent of highly intense wiggler and undulator beamlines has reintroduced the problem of X-ray radiation damage in protein crystals even at cryogenic temperatures (100 K). Although cryocrystallography can be utilized for the majority of protein crystals, certain macromolecular crystals (e.g. of viruses) suffer large increases in mosaicity upon flash cooling and data are still collected at room temperature (293 K). An alternative mechanism to cryocooling for prolonging crystal lifetime is the use of radioprotectants. These compounds are able to scavenge the free radical species formed upon X-ray irradiation which are thought to be responsible for part of the observed damage. Three putative radioprotectants, ascorbate, 1,4-benzoquinone and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidone (TEMP), were tested for their ability to prolong lysozyme crystal lifetimes at 293 K. Plots of relative summed intensity against dose were used as a metric to assess radioprotectant ability: ascorbate and 1,4-benzoquinone appear to be effective, whereas studies on TEMP were inconclusive. Ascorbate, which scavenges OH* radicals (k(OH) = 8 x 10(9) M(-1) s(-1)) and electrons with a lower rate constant (k(e-(aq)) = 3.0 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)), doubled the crystal dose tolerance, whereas 1,4-benzoquinone, which also scavenges both OH* radicals (k(OH) = 1.2 x 10(9) M(-1) s(-1)) and electrons (k(e-(aq)) = 1.2 x 10(10) M(-1) s(-1)), offered a ninefold increase in dose tolerance at the dose rates used. Pivotally, these preliminary results on a limited number of samples show that the two scavengers also induced a striking change in the dose dependence of the intensity decay from a first-order to a zeroth-order process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19240332     DOI: 10.1107/S0909049509003343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  17 in total

1.  Global radiation damage at 300 and 260 K with dose rates approaching 1 MGy s⁻¹.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Ryan Badeau; Jesse B Hopkins; Anne M Mulichak; Lisa J Keefe; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-01-17

2.  To scavenge or not to scavenge: that is the question.

Authors:  Elzbieta Nowak; Anna Brzuszkiewicz; Miroslawa Dauter; Zbigniew Dauter; Gerd Rosenbaum
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-08-14

3.  Dark progression reveals slow timescales for radiation damage between T = 180 and 240 K.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Ryan Badeau; Jesse Hopkins; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-08-09

4.  Can radiation damage to protein crystals be reduced using small-molecule compounds?

Authors:  Jan Kmetko; Matthew Warkentin; Ulrich Englich; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-09-08

5.  Spatial distribution of radiation damage to crystalline proteins at 25-300 K.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Ryan Badeau; Jesse B Hopkins; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-08-18

6.  Global radiation damage: temperature dependence, time dependence and how to outrun it.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Jesse B Hopkins; Ryan Badeau; Anne M Mulichak; Lisa J Keefe; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  X-ray-induced photo-chemistry and X-ray absorption spectroscopy of biological samples.

Authors:  Graham N George; Ingrid J Pickering; M Jake Pushie; Kurt Nienaber; Mark J Hackett; Isabella Ascone; Britt Hedman; Keith O Hodgson; Jade B Aitken; Aviva Levina; Christopher Glover; Peter A Lay
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.616

8.  Estimate your dose: RADDOSE-3D.

Authors:  Charles S Bury; Jonathan C Brooks-Bartlett; Steven P Walsh; Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?

Authors:  Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

10.  Kinetic modeling of the X-ray-induced damage to a metalloprotein.

Authors:  Katherine M Davis; Irina Kosheleva; Robert W Henning; Gerald T Seidler; Yulia Pushkar
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.