Literature DB >> 21476664

The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Andrew J Byrne1, Mark A Stellmack, Neal F Viemeister.   

Abstract

The enhancement effect is consistently shown when simultaneously masked stimuli are preceded by the masker alone, with a reduction in the amount of masking relative to when that precursor is absent. One explanation for this effect proposed by Viemeister and Bacon [(1982). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1502-1507] is the adaptation of inhibition, which predicts that an enhanced component (the "target") will be effectively more intense within the auditory system than one that has not been enhanced. Forward masking studies have indicated this effect of increased gain; however, other explanations of the enhancement effect have also been suggested. In order to provide an alternative measure of the amount of effective gain for an enhanced target, a subjective binaural centering task was used in which listeners matched the intensities of enhanced and unenhanced 2-kHz tones presented to opposite ears to produce a centered stimulus. The results showed that the enhancement effect produces an effective 4-5 dB increase in the level of the enhanced target. The enhancement effect was also measured using other enhancement paradigms which yielded similar results over a range of levels for the target, supporting an account based on adaptation of inhibition.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476664      PMCID: PMC3087390          DOI: 10.1121/1.3552880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: extension of a stimulus-response relationship.

Authors:  P J Abbas; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sequential effects on the detectability of a tone added to a multitone masker.

Authors:  Xiang Cao; Rong Huang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral and level effects in noise-on-tone suppression.

Authors:  A Sidwell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; S P Bacon; J R Lehman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral and ipsilateral cueing in forward masking.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

10.  Neural correlates of context-dependent perceptual enhancement in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  24 in total

1.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L).

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mitchell J Mostardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

4.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

8.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

10.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.