Literature DB >> 24116400

The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes.

Andrew J Byrne1, Mark A Stellmack, Neal F Viemeister.   

Abstract

A subjective listening task was used to measure the salience of enhanced components using typical intensity-enhancement stimuli, time-reversed versions of those stimuli, and stimuli which contained a frequency shift of the target component. Twenty-five listeners judged whether or not a pitch "stood out" within an inharmonic complex. For comparison, judgments also were made for stimuli with a single segment that consisted of a simultaneously masked target. The results indicate that the perceived salience of enhanced components is greater than might be predicted by the effective magnitude of those components, and that informational masking is likely involved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116400      PMCID: PMC3799686          DOI: 10.1121/1.4820897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

4.  On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Christophe Ramos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sequential effects on the detectability of a tone added to a multitone masker.

Authors:  Xiang Cao; Rong Huang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Enhancing a tone by shifting its frequency or intensity.

Authors:  Mayalen Erviti; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise.

Authors:  R P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: monotic and dichotic presentations.

Authors:  G Kidd; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

2.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

3.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack; Arthur Portron; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

5.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory sequential accumulation of spectral information.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.