Literature DB >> 19173378

Sequential effects on the detectability of a tone added to a multitone masker.

Xiang Cao1, Rong Huang, Virginia M Richards.   

Abstract

The detectability of a tone added to a masker is superior when the detection trial is preceded by the masker than the signal-plus-masker. This auditory enhancement can withstand long temporal gaps between the precursor and the trial, suggesting that for yes/no trials sensitivity may depend on the stimulus presented in the prior trial. The results from an experiment examining the detectability of a 1000-Hz tone added to 6-tone maskers confirmed sequential effects on sensitivity. The values of d(') were higher when the prior trial was a no-signal (masker alone) trial compared to a signal (signal-plus-masker) trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173378      PMCID: PMC2677274          DOI: 10.1121/1.3040027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release.

Authors:  D McFadden; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Rong Huang; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of informational maskers within and across trials.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Contrast in detection with gated noise.

Authors:  A Sandusky; A Ahumada
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking with continuous and pulsed sinusoids.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects.

Authors:  B A Wright; D McFadden; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance.

Authors:  S R Purks; D J Callahan; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Feedback and psychophysical variables in signal detection.

Authors:  E C Carterette; M P Friedman; M J Wyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sub-optimal construction of an auditory profile from temporally distributed spectral information.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Mariel Kazuko Tisby; Eli N Suzuki-Gill; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.