Literature DB >> 22352475

Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L).

Matthew J Goupell1, Mitchell J Mostardi.   

Abstract

The ability to match a pulsing electrode during multi-electrode stimulation through a research interface was measured in seven cochlear-implant (CI) users. Five listeners were relatively good at the task and two could not perform the task. Performance did not vary as a function of the number of electrodes or stimulation level. Performance on the matching task was not correlated to performance on an electrode-discrimination task. The listeners may have experienced the auditory enhancement effect, and this may have implications for speech recognition in noise for CI users.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352475      PMCID: PMC3292600          DOI: 10.1121/1.3672650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Enhancing and unmasking the harmonics of a complex tone.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks.

Authors:  L M Thibodeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Enhancing a tone by shifting its frequency or intensity.

Authors:  Mayalen Erviti; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal effects in simultaneous pure-tone masking in subjects with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  S P Bacon; M S Hedrick; D W Grantham
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1988

7.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-10
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

4.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

7.  Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.