Literature DB >> 20463220

Neural correlates of context-dependent perceptual enhancement in the inferior colliculus.

Paul C Nelson1, Eric D Young.   

Abstract

In certain situations, preceding auditory stimulation can actually result in heightened sensitivity to subsequent sounds. Many of these phenomena appear to be generated in the brain as reflections of central computations. One example is the robust perceptual enhancement (or "pop out") of a probe signal within a broadband sound whose onset time is delayed relative to the remainder of a mixture of tones. Here we show that the neural representation of such stimuli undergoes a dramatic transformation as the pathway is ascended, from an implicit and distributed peripheral code to explicitly facilitated single-neuron responses at the level of the inferior colliculus (IC) of two awake and passively listening female marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). Many key features of the IC responses directly parallel psychophysical measures of enhancement, including the dependence on the width of a spectral notch surrounding the probe, the overall level of the complex, and the duration of the preceding sound (referred to as the conditioner). Neural detection thresholds for the probe with and without the conditioner were also in qualitative agreement with analogous psychoacoustic measures. Response characteristics during the conditioners were predictive of the enhancement or suppression of the ensuing probe response: buildup responses were associated with enhancement, whereas adapting conditioner responses were more likely to result in suppression. These data can be primarily explained by a phenomenological computational model using dynamic (adapting) inhibition as a necessary ingredient in the generation of neural enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463220      PMCID: PMC2882180          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

1.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats. I. Classification based on frequency response maps.

Authors:  R Ramachandran; K A Davis; B J May
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats. II. Sensitivity to interaural level differences.

Authors:  K A Davis; R Ramachandran; B J May
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Intracellular recordings in response to monaural and binaural stimulation of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  S Kuwada; R Batra; T C Yin; D L Oliver; L B Haberly; T R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A reexamination of forward masking in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  E M Relkin; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  GABA inputs control discharge rate primarily within frequency receptive fields of inferior colliculus neurons.

Authors:  P S Palombi; D M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  26 in total

1.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

3.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Daniel E Shub; Eva Maria Carreira
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

9.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.