Literature DB >> 7085983

Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay.

W Jesteadt, S P Bacon, J R Lehman.   

Abstract

The forward masking of a sinusoidal signal by a sinusoid of the same frequency was investigated for frequencies ranging from 125 to 4000 Hz. Forward masking in dB is proportional to both masker level and log signal delay at each frequency. More forward masking occurs at very low frequencies than at high frequencies, given equal-sensation-level maskers, and masked thresholds are greater at low frequencies than at high frequencies given equal-SPL maskers. The data can be described equally well by assuming that the difference in forward masking as a function of frequency is due to a change in the time course of recovery from masking or to a change in the growth of masking at each signal delay. The frequency effect is not large enough to change the interpretation of forward-masking data in studies of suppression or psychophysical tuning curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7085983     DOI: 10.1121/1.387576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking by inaudible sounds and the linearity of temporal summation.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Vit Drga
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

5.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of phase and stimulus-onset asynchrony.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Forward masking estimated by signal detection theory analysis of neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ana Alves-Pinto; Sylvie Baudoux; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.