Literature DB >> 22225048

Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Gerald Kidd1, Virginia M Richards, Timothy Streeter, Christine R Mason, Rong Huang.   

Abstract

This study investigated the benefit of a priori cues in a masked nonspeech pattern identification experiment. Targets were narrowband sequences of tone bursts forming six easily identifiable frequency patterns selected randomly on each trial. The frequency band containing the target was randomized. Maskers were also narrowband sequences of tone bursts chosen randomly on every trial. Targets and maskers were presented monaurally in mutually exclusive frequency bands, producing large amounts of informational masking. Cuing the masker produced a significant improvement in performance, while holding the target frequency band constant provided no benefit. The cue providing the greatest benefit was a copy of the masker presented ipsilaterally before the target-plus-masker. The masker cue presented contralaterally, and a notched-noise cue produced smaller benefits. One possible mechanism underlying these findings is auditory "enhancement" in which the neural response to the target is increased relative to the masker by differential prior stimulation of the target and masker frequency regions. A second possible mechanism provides a benefit to performance by comparing the spectrotemporal correspondence of the cue and target-plus-masker and is effective for either ipsilateral or contralateral cue presentation. These effects improve identification performance by emphasizing spectral contrasts in sequences or streams of sounds.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22225048      PMCID: PMC3253596          DOI: 10.1121/1.3658442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks.

Authors:  L M Thibodeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement.

Authors:  A R Palmer; Q Summerfield; D A Fantini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural advantage for sound pattern identification.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; T L Rohtla
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise.

Authors:  R P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Detection and recognition of auditory patterns.

Authors:  D L Weber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

6.  Auditory enhancement and the perception of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; P F Assmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

7.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

8.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: monotic and dichotic presentations.

Authors:  G Kidd; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory sequential accumulation of spectral information.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  No Need for Templates in the Auditory Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Neural Correlates of Auditory Figure-Ground Segregation Based on Temporal Coherence.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Nicolas Barascud; Samuel Picard; Christopher Payne; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Segregation of complex acoustic scenes based on temporal coherence.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Maria Chait; Sukhbinder Kumar; Shihab Shamma; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.