Literature DB >> 26805025

Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Ningyuan Wang1, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Auditory enhancement refers to the observation that the salience of one spectral region (the "signal") of a broadband sound can be enhanced and can "pop out" from the remainder of the sound (the "masker") if it is preceded by the broadband sound without the signal. The present study investigated auditory enhancement as an effective change in loudness, to determine whether it reflects a change in the loudness of the signal, the masker, or both. In the first experiment, the 500-ms precursor, an inharmonic complex with logarithmically spaced components, was followed after a 50-ms gap by the 100-ms signal or masker alone, the loudness of which was compared with that of the same signal or masker presented 2 s later. In the second experiment, the loudness of the signal embedded in the masker was assessed with and without a precursor using the same method, as was the loudness of the entire signal-plus-masker complex. The results suggest that the precursor does not affect the loudness of the signal or the masker alone, but enhances the loudness of the signal in the presence of the masker, while leaving the loudness of the surrounding masker unaffected. The results are consistent with an explanation based on "adaptation of inhibition" [Viemeister and Bacon (1982). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1502-1507].
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory context effects; Auditory enhancement; Loudness context effects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26805025      PMCID: PMC4798863          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

1.  Loudness enhancement: monaural, binaural, and dichotic.

Authors:  R Elmasian; R Galambos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks.

Authors:  L M Thibodeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement.

Authors:  A R Palmer; Q Summerfield; D A Fantini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects.

Authors:  B A Wright; D McFadden; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

2.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.