Literature DB >> 28303412

Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Heather A Kreft1, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Auditory enhancement is the phenomenon whereby the salience or detectability of a target sound within a masker is enhanced by the prior presentation of the masker alone. Enhancement has been demonstrated using both simultaneous and forward masking in normal-hearing listeners and may play an important role in auditory and speech perception within complex and time-varying acoustic environments. The few studies of enhancement in hearing-impaired listeners have reported reduced or absent enhancement effects under forward masking, suggesting a potentially peripheral locus of the effect. Here, auditory enhancement was measured in eight cochlear-implant (CI) users with direct stimulation. Masked thresholds were measured under simultaneous and forward masking as a function of the number of masking electrodes, and the electrode spacing between the maskers and the target. Evidence for auditory enhancement was obtained under simultaneous masking, qualitatively consistent with results from normal-hearing listeners. However, no significant enhancement was observed under forward masking, in contrast to earlier results with normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that the normal effects of auditory enhancement are partially but not fully experienced by CI users. To the extent that the CI users' results differ from normal, it may be possible to apply signal processing to restore the missing aspects of enhancement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; cochlear implants; context effects; enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303412      PMCID: PMC5418162          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0618-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  33 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Rong Huang; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

5.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack; Arthur Portron; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression?

Authors:  C I Berlin; L J Hood; R P Cecola; D F Jackson; P Szabo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of pulsing of a target tone on the ability to hear it out in different types of complex sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.