Literature DB >> 21361452

Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.

Ewen N MacDonald1, David W Purcell, Kevin G Munhall.   

Abstract

Two auditory feedback perturbation experiments were conducted to examine the nature of control of the first two formants in vowels. In the first experiment, talkers heard their auditory feedback with either F1 or F2 shifted in frequency. Talkers altered production of the perturbed formant by changing its frequency in the opposite direction to the perturbation but did not produce a correlated alteration of the unperturbed formant. Thus, the motor control system is capable of fine-grained independent control of F1 and F2. In the second experiment, a large meta-analysis was conducted on data from talkers who received feedback where both F1 and F2 had been perturbed. A moderate correlation was found between individual compensations in F1 and F2 suggesting that the control of F1 and F2 is processed in a common manner at some level. While a wide range of individual compensation magnitudes were observed, no significant correlations were found between individuals' compensations and vowel space differences. Similarly, no significant correlations were found between individuals' compensations and variability in normal vowel production. Further, when receiving normal auditory feedback, most of the population exhibited no significant correlation between the natural variation in production of F1 and F2.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361452      PMCID: PMC3070987          DOI: 10.1121/1.3531932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  50 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Linear degrees of freedom in speech production: analysis of cineradio- and labio-film data and articulatory-acoustic modeling.

Authors:  D Beautemps; P Badin; G Bailly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specificity of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tremblay; Guillaume Houle; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A biomechanical model of cardinal vowel production: muscle activations and the impact of gravity on tongue positioning.

Authors:  Stéphanie Buchaillard; Pascal Perrier; Yohan Payan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Analysis of tongue positions: language-specific and cross-linguistic models.

Authors:  M T Jackson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

Authors:  H L Pick; G M Siegel; P W Fox; S R Garber; J K Kearney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Coordination and coarticulation in speech production.

Authors:  C A Fowler; E Saltzman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Apr-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Lip-larynx coordination in speech: effects of mechanical perturbations to the lower lip.

Authors:  K G Munhall; A Löfqvist; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N Macdonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Fabienne Samson; Lucie Ménard; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Kevin G Munhall; David W Purcell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Multivoxel patterns reveal functionally differentiated networks underlying auditory feedback processing of speech.

Authors:  Zane Z Zheng; Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall; Rhodri Cusack; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.