Literature DB >> 22087926

A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Takashi Mitsuya1, Ewen N Macdonald, David W Purcell, Kevin G Munhall.   

Abstract

Past studies have shown that when formants are perturbed in real time, speakers spontaneously compensate for the perturbation by changing their formant frequencies in the opposite direction to the perturbation. Further, the pattern of these results suggests that the processing of auditory feedback error operates at a purely acoustic level. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the response of three language groups to real-time formant perturbations, (1) native English speakers producing an English vowel /ε/, (2) native Japanese speakers producing a Japanese vowel (/e([inverted perpendicular])/), and (3) native Japanese speakers learning English, producing /ε/. All three groups showed similar production patterns when F1 was decreased; however, when F1 was increased, the Japanese groups did not compensate as much as the native English speakers. Due to this asymmetry, the hypothesis that the compensatory production for formant perturbation operates at a purely acoustic level was rejected. Rather, some level of phonological processing influences the feedback processing behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087926      PMCID: PMC3261647          DOI: 10.1121/1.3643826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  W Strange; R Akahane-Yamada; R Kubo; S A Trent; K Nishi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vowel features in Turkish accented English.

Authors:  Manwa L Ng; Yang Chen; Janine Sadaka
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.484

4.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: influence of training sets.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Marc Sato; Vincent L Gracco; Shari R Baum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Robyn Goldberg; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation.

Authors:  John F Houde; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  17 in total

1.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Fabienne Samson; Lucie Ménard; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Authors:  Xiaoying Tang; Na Chen; Siyun Zhang; Jeffery A Jones; Baofeng Zhang; Jingyuan Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Chelsea Pettibone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Kevin G Munhall; David W Purcell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.