Literature DB >> 19679079

Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Robert J van Beers1.   

Abstract

In motor learning, our brain uses movement errors to adjust planning of future movements. This process has traditionally been studied by examining how motor planning is adjusted in response to visuomotor or dynamic perturbations. Here, I show that the learning strategy can be better identified from the statistics of movements made in the absence of perturbations. The strategy identified this way differs from the learning mechanism assumed in mainstream models for motor learning. Crucial for this strategy is that motor noise arises partly centrally, in movement planning, and partly peripherally, in movement execution. Corrections are made by modification of central planning signals from the previous movement, which include the effects of planning but not execution noise. The size of the corrections is such that the movement variability is minimized. This physiologically plausible strategy is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise, and likely underlies learning in many motor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679079     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  118 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Daniel Wert; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation.

Authors:  Mollie K Marko; Adrian M Haith; Michelle D Harran; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  How the required precision influences the way we intercept a moving object.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A theory for how sensorimotor skills are learned and retained in noisy and nonstationary neural circuits.

Authors:  Robert Ajemian; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Helene Moorman; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert; Jon W Sensinger; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Zachary C Thumser; Raviraj Nataraj; Dylan T Beckler; Michael R Dawson; Dan H Blustein; Satinder Gill; Brett D Mensh; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Madeline D Newcomb; Jason P Carey; Beth M Orzell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 10.  Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis.

Authors:  Joseph P Cusumano; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.