Literature DB >> 28464681

Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

William L Schuerman1, Srikantan Nagarajan2, James M McQueen3, John Houde4.   

Abstract

A given speech sound will be realized differently depending on the context in which it is produced. Listeners have been found to compensate perceptually for these coarticulatory effects, yet it is unclear to what extent this effect depends on actual production experience. In this study, whether changes in motor-to-sound mappings induced by adaptation to altered auditory feedback can affect perceptual compensation for coarticulation is investigated. Specifically, whether altering how the vowel [i] is produced can affect the categorization of a stimulus continuum between an alveolar and a palatal fricative whose interpretation is dependent on vocalic context is tested. It was found that participants could be sorted into three groups based on whether they tended to oppose the direction of the shifted auditory feedback, to follow it, or a mixture of the two, and that these articulatory responses, not the shifted feedback the participants heard, correlated with changes in perception. These results indicate that sensorimotor adaptation to altered feedback can affect the perception of unaltered yet coarticulatorily-dependent speech sounds, suggesting a modulatory role of sensorimotor experience on speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464681      PMCID: PMC5848838          DOI: 10.1121/1.4979791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  56 in total

1.  Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels.

Authors:  C A Fowler; J M Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

5.  Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

6.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; David J Ostry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Emily Neufeld; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction.

Authors:  Cassandra L Jacobs; Torrey M Loucks; Duane G Watson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.842

2.  Recalibration of auditory perception of speech due to orofacial somatosensory inputs during speech motor adaptation.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohashi; Takayuki Ito
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  What drives the perceptual change resulting from speech motor adaptation? Evaluation of hypotheses in a Bayesian modeling framework.

Authors:  Jean-François Patri; Pascal Perrier; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Julien Diard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A Simple 3-Parameter Model for Examining Adaptation in Speech and Voice Production.

Authors:  Elaine Kearney; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Hasini R Weerathunge; Riccardo Falsini; Ayoub Daliri; Defne Abur; Kirrie J Ballard; Soo-Eun Chang; Sara-Ching Chao; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Terri L Scott; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-21

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech depends on the direction of auditory feedback alteration.

Authors:  Hardik Kothare; Inez Raharjo; Vikram Ramanarayanan; Kamalini Ranasinghe; Benjamin Parrell; Keith Johnson; John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.