Literature DB >> 23654403

Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.

Takashi Mitsuya1, Fabienne Samson, Lucie Ménard, Kevin G Munhall.   

Abstract

The representation of speech goals was explored using an auditory feedback paradigm. When talkers produce vowels the formant structure of which is perturbed in real time, they compensate to preserve the intended goal. When vowel formants are shifted up or down in frequency, participants change the formant frequencies in the opposite direction to the feedback perturbation. In this experiment, the specificity of vowel representation was explored by examining the magnitude of vowel compensation when the second formant frequency of a vowel was perturbed for speakers of two different languages (English and French). Even though the target vowel was the same for both language groups, the pattern of compensation differed. French speakers compensated to smaller perturbations and made larger compensations overall. Moreover, French speakers modified the third formant in their vowels to strengthen the compensation even though the third formant was not perturbed. English speakers did not alter their third formant. Changes in the perceptual goodness ratings by the two groups of participants were consistent with the threshold to initiate vowel compensation in production. These results suggest that vowel goals not only specify the quality of the vowel but also the relationship of the vowel to the vowel space of the spoken language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654403      PMCID: PMC3663859          DOI: 10.1121/1.4795786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N Macdonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Bronwen G Evans
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels.

Authors:  A R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M Hampson; D Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Robyn Goldberg; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  11-month-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-09

8.  Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels.

Authors:  B Hose; G Langner; H Scheich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Children's development of self-regulation in speech production.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Elizabeth K Johnson; Jaime Forsythe; Paul Plante; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  12 in total

1.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Authors:  Xiaoying Tang; Na Chen; Siyun Zhang; Jeffery A Jones; Baofeng Zhang; Jingyuan Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Chelsea Pettibone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Kevin G Munhall; David W Purcell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; K G Munhall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Increased speech contrast induced by sensorimotor adaptation to a nonuniform auditory perturbation.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Caroline A Niziolek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Compensations to auditory feedback perturbations in congenitally blind and sighted speakers: Acoustic and articulatory data.

Authors:  Pamela Trudeau-Fisette; Mark Tiede; Lucie Ménard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.