Literature DB >> 28464659

Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Takashi Mitsuya1, Kevin G Munhall2, David W Purcell3.   

Abstract

The interaction of language production and perception has been substantiated by empirical studies where speakers compensate their speech articulation in response to the manipulated sound of their voice heard in real-time as auditory feedback. A recent study by Max and Maffett [(2015). Neurosci. Lett. 591, 25-29] reported an absence of compensation (i.e., auditory-motor learning) for frequency-shifted formants when auditory feedback was delayed by 100 ms. In the present study, the effect of auditory feedback delay was studied when only the first formant was manipulated while delaying auditory feedback systematically. In experiment 1, a small yet significant compensation was observed even with 100 ms of auditory delay unlike the past report. This result suggests that the tolerance of feedback delay depends on different types of auditory errors being processed. In experiment 2, it was revealed that the amount of formant compensation had an inverse linear relationship with the amount of auditory delay. One of the speculated mechanisms to account for these results is that as auditory delay increases, undelayed (and unperturbed) somatosensory feedback is given more preference for accuracy control of vowel formants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464659      PMCID: PMC5552393          DOI: 10.1121/1.4981139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The self across the senses: an fMRI study of self-face and self-voice recognition.

Authors:  Jonas T Kaplan; Lisa Aziz-Zadeh; Lucina Q Uddin; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Robyn Goldberg; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The missing fundamental in vowel height perception.

Authors:  R P Fahey; R L Diehl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

8.  Preliminary observations on tickling oneself.

Authors:  L Weiskrantz; J Elliott; C Darlington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; C R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exposure to Auditory Feedback Delay while Speaking Induces Perceptual Habituation but does not Mitigate the Disruptive Effect of Delay on Speech Auditory-motor Learning.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Takashi Mitsuya; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Auditory Feedback Control Mechanisms Do Not Contribute to Cortical Hyperactivity Within the Voice Production Network in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Anne J Blood; James Burns; J Pieter Noordzij; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Sensitivity of Speech Output to Delayed Auditory Feedback in Primary Progressive Aphasias.

Authors:  Chris J D Hardy; Rebecca L Bond; Kankamol Jaisin; Charles R Marshall; Lucy L Russell; Katrina Dick; Sebastian J Crutch; Jonathan D Rohrer; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  It's About Time: Minimizing Hardware and Software Latencies in Speech Research With Real-Time Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Hantao Wang; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.

Authors:  Daniel R Nault; Takashi Mitsuya; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.473

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.